Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion (Re: Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings)
"Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com> Thu, 21 February 2013 22:36 UTC
Return-Path: <mandyam@quicinc.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FC621E8041 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:36:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OHkR9L3EZLzj for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:36:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D236C21E803F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:36:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=quicinc.com; i=@quicinc.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1361486204; x=1393022204; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=RW53zgG0b9Oj+E0jGBp68Huwi7g56qNrAMqyVR+RC50=; b=Op6TjHac4qt68P5f/Hev5gVchd3m8ElcLIEomrrNZZxnjmeNP0Pn13FW BzD/a0/bl6fQIlWvuwcC0UZy7ZZoRXzma+u1WmP9MmSVbNeBEji9cZ/mR 8RxeMnkoMy1MIFQ0FlxOblMFVWK37hhnNd+3YlZwwCjPq6jqjMnytKxT+ 4=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,711,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="24816113"
Received: from ironmsg01-lv.qualcomm.com ([10.47.202.180]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2013 14:36:43 -0800
Received: from nasanexhc09.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.8]) by ironmsg01-lv.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 21 Feb 2013 14:36:43 -0800
Received: from NASANEXD01H.na.qualcomm.com ([169.254.8.113]) by nasanexhc09.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.8]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:36:43 -0800
From: "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion (Re: Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings)
Thread-Index: AQHOEETTL+uAvwUANkiKIH4O920rk5iE+goAgAADFoCAAG1NgP//er9Q
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:36:42 +0000
Message-ID: <CAC8DBE4E9704C41BCB290C2F3CC921A163D48D6@nasanexd01h.na.qualcomm.com>
References: <CABcZeBMg0AdhFj61S1hgz9WCP2JikLabrm3dAA36hyb99_93Sg@mail.gmail.com> <51263796.8030705@alvestrand.no> <CABcZeBPoH+QQg1dPEoCc1AgwFVYdmHduwZ7W8qCahOr+Spz8eQ@mail.gmail.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484161EB226@TK5EX14MBXC273.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CA+9kkMD_a7Si5F+4PiggmLkAtTUaocrF=bYd0oy0bv-bZ6zzdA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMD_a7Si5F+4PiggmLkAtTUaocrF=bYd0oy0bv-bZ6zzdA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.230.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion (Re: Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:36:45 -0000
Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>: >> If the relevant browser vendors and other interested parties would like to have this discussion, it should happen within the W3C. Ted: > I point out that the W3C has already sent a liaison statement on this topic (http://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1215/) If the working group wishes to be guided by the W3C on this topic, in other words, it can use this liaison statement as guidance. Note that the W3C did not consult with member companies in forming the referenced liaison statement. I do not consider this statement to be indicative of any kind of discussion ever having taken place within the W3C in which member companies were allowed to be involved. -Giri Mandyam, Qualcomm Innovation Center -----Original Message----- From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Hardie Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 2:26 PM To: Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion (Re: Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings) On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> wrote: > I'm going to again object to having the video codec discussion in the > IETF venue. The choice of mandatory video codecs within the browser > context is a presentation-layer choice and highly related to a > discussion that has already happened in the W3C context for video playback. > > > > Arguing that because the codecs produce bits and those bits go on the > wire and then somehow that makes it an IETF issue is specious. The > text of the JavaScript sent to the browser also goes "on the wire" and > is also out of scope for the IETF. > > > > If the relevant browser vendors and other interested parties would > like to have this discussion, it should happen within the W3C. > Hi Matthew, Bullets 4 and 5 of the RTCWEB charter call out this work of this type as in-scope, with codecs mentioned specifically. If working group participants are persuaded by your argument, though, I point out that the W3C has already sent a liaison statement on this topic (http://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1215/) If the working group wishes to be guided by the W3C on this topic, in other words, it can use this liaison statement as guidance. regards, Ted Hardie _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- [rtcweb] Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings Suhas Nandakumar
- [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion (Re… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Ron