Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion (Re: Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings)
Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> Fri, 22 February 2013 09:18 UTC
Return-Path: <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3BC21F8891 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 01:18:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qoJaqNDqhYk0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 01:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E27621F888B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 01:18:14 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f316d0000028db-68-512737cd74d7
Received: from esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 96.AF.10459.DC737215; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:18:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [150.132.141.119] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:18:04 +0100
Message-ID: <512737CB.6010703@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:18:03 +0100
From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CABcZeBMg0AdhFj61S1hgz9WCP2JikLabrm3dAA36hyb99_93Sg@mail.gmail.com> <51263796.8030705@alvestrand.no> <CABcZeBPoH+QQg1dPEoCc1AgwFVYdmHduwZ7W8qCahOr+Spz8eQ@mail.gmail.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484161EB226@TK5EX14MBXC273.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CA+9kkMD_a7Si5F+4PiggmLkAtTUaocrF=bYd0oy0bv-bZ6zzdA@mail.gmail.com> <5126C5BA.4060701@matthew.at>
In-Reply-To: <5126C5BA.4060701@matthew.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrFJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje5Zc/VAg98HRC3W/mtnd2D0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxtWfexgLPrJW7F58h62B8T5LFyMHh4SAiUTXhPAuRk4gU0zi wr31bCC2kMBJRokjr+q7GLmA7LWMEi2/O9hB6nkFtCVm9viAmCwCqhKrJ4aClLMJBEpc//+L CSQsKhAlcWWfJUiYV0BQ4uTMJywgtoiAsMTWV71MILawQJLErpPdzBDT3zFJLP64GuwaTgEt iYvP00FqmAVsJS7Muc4CYctLbH87hxniMl2Jd6/vsU5gFJiFZMUsJC2zkLQsYGRexciem5iZ k15uuIkRGF4Ht/zW3cF46pzIIUZpDhYlcd4w1wsBQgLpiSWp2ampBalF8UWlOanFhxiZODil Ghineiz1/BU11eTrFdVjcZ/+9z8WZF8Styufeb5cqOzKjFyPVeZ3jqV2fNunPsPg94up0Zav 5ErCvbfLu62+ZJy1ZJNf9P3Ifb+MJpn919b6Xh4g/kLnlDx3crX1muSVwXUxxlu4N0W6V57p /pMSc+vAjVn1E27fmHjqoHHo4oBsoVu+89esfGOjxFKckWioxVxUnAgAK5jykP0BAAA=
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion (Re: Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:18:16 -0000
On 2013-02-22 02:11, Matthew Kaufman wrote: > If there is a plan for a substantial change along these lines to be > announced prior to the (inappropriate) discussion at the upcoming IETF > meeting, I hope it can be made public with sufficient time for our large > legal department to review it, otherwise I don't see how anyone could > expect a revised opinion at that time. I agree. Any input related to legal or licensing aspects would have to come real soon to be able to have a meaningful discussion at the upcoming meeting for the reason Matthew gives. Stefan > > Matthew Kaufman > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- [rtcweb] Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings Suhas Nandakumar
- [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion (Re… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video discussion… Ron