Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal avail on the webrtc list

Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> Wed, 05 October 2011 02:27 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1E321F8B02 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.616
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.983, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4bckR8jwskQj for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (mx.skype.net [78.141.177.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BA821F8B01 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CFC16F6; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:30:16 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=skype.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mx; bh=ojN35410boJW7j OtOzf0YVeKGd8=; b=rnc5dMXv8a1YS7sBf/Pfm5HmfLow4rm3UdyUdAbLFcMJoM hO962mSwrh7uXlwt65xiCObIoGCPD9FRXSuMZE2qVG7hUXNUwL4hTzLa4bFRyZOQ t3r0lab3+5ZxlwqrywJKL3mXiv2KGrQI9GKUS0FsCm89SmAsARpJDIvVASXsM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=skype.net; h=message-id:date:from :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mx; b=L1Y8uow22wFG6w69gYZuNS dUPWoXHk/qkrD8xXD3lXnu4gdYdUyKYmKSanOVjm/MolX4MAyXUr6G5T+XiEP8fs 5l5/BpR1WbqseBBuKnXdaAhlkWuBklpUA3s41+rws61Lt/18F61urZzzAhCfML34 SeqlyRt+P3/n0xDRdfqzg=
Received: from zimbra.skype.net (zimbra.skype.net [78.141.177.82]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDFC7F6; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:30:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4C13507097; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:30:16 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lu2-zimbra.skype.net
Received: from zimbra.skype.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.skype.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94rCowrVN+fJ; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:30:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.10.155.2] (unknown [198.202.199.254]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49BDB350708A; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:30:15 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E8BC0ED.2020001@skype.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:29:01 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
References: <545388B3-3189-4291-BD1D-52898B888F3E@phonefromhere.com> <CAD5OKxt_3bnODVCWxrrrKVWO3R3Or1FjhMOHwgUzq3-h6dW0LA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxt_3bnODVCWxrrrKVWO3R3Or1FjhMOHwgUzq3-h6dW0LA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal avail on the webrtc list
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 02:27:11 -0000

On 9/28/2011 9:12 AM, Roman Shpount wrote:
> Few questions that I have in regard to this:
>
>
> 3. How do you process multiple answers for the same dialog?
>
> 4. What do we do with multiple answers from a forked dialog? Is it 
> even supported?
>

This stuff is exactly what you'll need to add yet more code to solve if 
you try to bake SDP offer-answer into the browser to turn it 90% of the 
way into a SIP phone.

And exactly what you *don't* need browser code to solve if it is done 
elsewhere (for instance, the server might be handling the entire SIP and 
SDP exchange and resolve forking issues at that end without involving 
the client at all.)

Matthew Kaufman