Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

David Singer <singer@apple.com> Fri, 22 November 2013 02:05 UTC

Return-Path: <singer@apple.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3881AE29B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:05:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.427
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.427 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Jn6_gr4qQYv for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:05:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (bramley.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92351ADED6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:05:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Received: from relay7.apple.com ([17.128.113.101]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MWN00KUD75HV430@mail-out.apple.com> for rtcweb@ietf.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:05:42 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11807165-b7f8e6d000004de8-22-528ebbf56844
Received: from koseret (koseret.apple.com [17.151.62.39]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay7.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id DE.A4.19944.5FBBE825; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:05:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.10.39] (sftp.tritondataservices.com [76.74.153.49]) by koseret.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0MWN00AX875D6520@koseret.apple.com> for rtcweb@ietf.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:05:41 -0800 (PST)
References: <7949EED078736C4881C92F656DC6F6C130EA8AD7ED@ausmsex00.austin.kmvtechnologies.com> <E62E1CAF-546D-4A0E-9339-D03D6C0BC1AE@apple.com> <528EBAB0.2010906@librevideo.org>
In-reply-to: <528EBAB0.2010906@librevideo.org>
Message-id: <D125BF97-73BE-4591-8C70-30C03974CC78@apple.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11B554a)
From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:05:37 -0800
To: Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@librevideo.org>
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiON1OXffr7r4ggzkNFhZr/7WzOzB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoErY9K0VywF/1grVv14ydbA+J6li5GDQ0LAROLQrtQuRk4gU0zi wr31bF2MXBxCAi1MEkcf7mSFcDYySez/sIEJwtnGKLHi8UxGkBZeAXGJ10engNmcAnoSb5ds ZAWxmQW0JNbvPM4EYWtLPHl3gRWi3kZiY2crO0RcXWLp5AY2iNWyEmduTwGLswmoSjyYcwxs prCAmcSH+x1gcRag+Lefy1lAbBEBY4nPh+YwT2AUmIXkjFlIVs9CsnoBI/MqRoGi1JzESnO9 xIKCnFS95PzcTYyg0GsoTN3B2Ljc6hCjAAejEg/vDsu+ICHWxLLiytxDjBIczEoivB4bgEK8 KYmVValF+fFFpTmpxYcYpTlYlMR5O9YApQTSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLJMHJxSDYwuJXxP6i5dVFxd cvHjnJ1z+nIjmXd88LVb+qugY9nxfZJOktydHVr/HNWDli+XTJqdWNItk2G53Ooa+6sdjbOl a64JxK684He++sT95CVVU2apR7rfMYmJ+rDf//uh+ykHfG8VRC+8z2yQPsHnf3ptSJjytUeL Mmdu2V+y6uunueuuTTkZ899diaU4I9FQi7moOBEAeZ3V1zkCAAA=
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:05:51 -0000

Ok, even though the standard issued in early 1996, more than 17 years ago?

Sent from my iPad

> On Nov 21, 2013, at 6:00 PM, Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@librevideo.org>; wrote:
> 
>> On 11/21/2013 08:23 PM, David Singer wrote:
>> 
>> Can someone remind me why classic H.263 (with possibly the minor tweaks for picture size limits etc.) is problematic?
> 
> For exactly the same reasons H.264 (for some) and VP8 (for others) - IPR
> issues due to not being old enough for anything patented in the standard
> to be guaranteed to have expired.
> 
> -- 
> Libre Video
> http://librevideo.org
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb