Re: [rtcweb] draft-kaplan-rtcweb-sip-interworking-requirements-00

[Hadriel Kaplan <[e-mail]>]

On Oct 25, 2011, at 2:06 AM, Ravindran Parthasarathi wrote:

> Just adding one more point regarding architecture, Media plane
> interworking function is an optional element for the next generation
> (release) of SIP devices wherein Media agent of SIP UA will be able to
> interop directly with browser media plane without intermediate
> media-plane gateways.

Do you mean that statement as an argument against the draft?  That was why I kept using the term "deployed" throughout the draft. :)

Or did you mean it in the sense of an additional requirement that should be added to draft?  That would make sense and I can add it.  Something like:

"It MUST be possible to determine whether interworking is required on a session-by-session basis in order to avoid performing interworking when it is not needed."

Does that capture what you meant?

I think that's possible to do for pretty much everything in the draft, except RTCP generation. (which is possibly the ugliest interworking to have to do in the whole doc)

-hadriel