Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-06.txt - PeerConnection BUNDLE policy

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 10:44 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C6A1A0DBB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 02:44:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vPrWf3jqyUim for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 02:44:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF351A0CB7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 02:44:35 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f5d8e000002a7b-60-53145d0f4646
Received: from ESESSHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 56.2F.10875.F0D54135; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:44:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.216]) by ESESSHC008.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.42]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:44:31 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-06.txt - PeerConnection BUNDLE policy
Thread-Index: Ac8pjtnjzyDELOBDTjiX88M43xAyxwDrMPeAARFru7ABNZy1AAAdWm5Q
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 10:44:30 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1C5C73@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1730E7@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAOJ7v-2ecnurvXs426-TsZwwjpwiVQNPNWqw8=0+bsEHCcDeoA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1B5588@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAOJ7v-01vv6cwi-LEcZUqzORdpxnB=G_tvHM_UfcY5kUd7m3RA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-01vv6cwi-LEcZUqzORdpxnB=G_tvHM_UfcY5kUd7m3RA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.154]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1C5C73ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja5ArEiwwTQzi61ThSzW/mtnd2Dy WLCp1GPJkp9MAUxRXDYpqTmZZalF+nYJXBnz+k6zFpwwrfjy7DNTA2OLSRcjJ4eEgInE/vYP jBC2mMSFe+vZuhi5OIQEDjFK7J3fxAzhLGaUuDLrE5DDwcEmYCHR/U8bpEFEQE3i4axdrCA2 s4C6xJ3F59hBbGGBBIk199cwQtQkSrz+3cEGYbtJ/D76BKyeRUBFYvmm3SwgNq+Ar8S9k1NY IHbNZ5LY9WIKWAOnQKDEw3tTwQYxAl33/dQaJohl4hK3nsxngrhaQGLJnvPMELaoxMvH/1gh bCWJRbc/Q9XnS9w6v4ENYpmgxMmZT1gmMIrOQjJqFpKyWUjKZgG9zCygKbF+lz5EiaLElO6H 7BC2hkTrnLnsyOILGNlXMbLnJmbmpJcbbmIERtPBLb91dzCeOidyiFGag0VJnPfDW+cgIYH0 xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLSnNTiQ4xMHJxSDYxilyZdd2eVO9P4PTLyqyOLU+BLTq+LTNJvpu7d277u y7tpjEsZvHxCvt5Yn71U/W/bJK1z4TF//lXOn2sS2dfW0pja3Rb5MYGxeZOilKHovT9xGZwL mHh+aB9ev+z9aY65+94cLnwZFbzIKGjJ/xQfsToNTV1Z4Vidd69/v1sovm6zV5PXRx0lluKM REMt5qLiRAB3ykJRdAIAAA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/jOZ01HwJfBP9yzTTCl6Ej7EBQXY
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-06.txt - PeerConnection BUNDLE policy
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 10:44:38 -0000

Hi,

>In the typical case, you don't need to set this; the implementation knows to use unique ports >in the initial offer and then can do the appropriate thing in future offers (i.e., once BUNDLE >support by the remote side is known). In the case where you want to start with shared ports in >the initial offer, because you know through some mechanism that the remote side supports >this, the bundle-policy constraint could allow you to indicate this, i.e. that you want bundling >to start immediately.
>
>I agree that a new value is needed to support this.

Good ☺

Regards,

Christer