Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC
Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 30 July 2013 07:56 UTC
Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D16D21E80BD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.767
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.767 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.182, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oNTmsxuauIoj for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5518C11E80F4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f826d000001766-ee-51f771a7f2fc
Received: from ESESSHC003.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 06.16.05990.7A177F15; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:56:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.135]) by ESESSHC003.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.27]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:56:23 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC
Thread-Index: AQHOjIHcZ/1hbOJS5UyRjSuEQ/tcvJl7zDIAgAABWACAAMllYIAAIOKAgAAjYvA=
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:56:22 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4135FD@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CALiegfnU0U0juKu8y68K-pfkdf9NwQPxH=yM7vt=1EZEg=fxtA@mail.gmail.com> <1375119910.76535.YahooMailNeo@web171302.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <CALiegfms3r7RSZ=nCH2fSFLnRxc8UjkL4F2d3evFs5XJOWmAbw@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4132BF@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfkRZHTSEfoAgfnn6vFHKgo8VwxwKnLJzkVxaXF=5ntK1Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfkRZHTSEfoAgfnn6vFHKgo8VwxwKnLJzkVxaXF=5ntK1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: fi-FI
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.146]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrDLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre6Kwu+BBk0beC2m/jjOYjF9n41F 78cljBZr/7WzO7B4nGt4z+6xZMlPJo+j8/azerya/pA9gCWKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK6Ovt4O9 4ARLxc8nz1gbGHewdDFycEgImEgcWMPVxcgJZIpJXLi3ng3EFhI4zCjx+ox2FyMXkL2EUeLN rC9sIPVsAhYS3f+0QWpEBGwk/l24wA5iMwvUS9w9/JQFxBYGGtm9YDUzRI2pxIYPx5kgbD+J ozt2gs1nEVCVOPvrEFg9r4CvxPdPXUwQux4ySZx5O4URJMEpECjxaVcbWAMj0HHfT61hglgm LvHh4HVmiKMFJJbsOQ9li0q8fPyPFcJWkvix4RLYj8wCmhLrd+lDtCpKTOl+yA6xV1Di5Mwn LBMYxWYhmToLoWMWko5ZSDoWMLKsYmTPTczMSS832sQIjKGDW36r7mC8c07kEKM0B4uSOO9m vTOBQgLpiSWp2ampBalF8UWlOanFhxiZODilGhjLQvkT3xp8v3k3ysT1RrLXxmSzax33i2fU li5uU+14/mvWooqngnscPBalN7LtCr/M6XTlZ+arf1uk1qmGxl498Mnx9RyDKf6CiVpPA4SX +FxkOyHwX1g9/fOSKRYid62939vNkXX+Js9yUev/ibyXQlMCtX5dO2kkm2uTuz3m8rmC4FXM N9YrsRRnJBpqMRcVJwIAgZaBim8CAAA=
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:56:44 -0000
>> I meant that each entity would >> offer it’s m- lines as part of separate Offer/Answer transactions. It >> IS allowed to add m- lines in a subsequent Offer. > > Yes, but that seems 100% unnecessary. The only we need is that peer-A tells peer-B about its tracks and peer-B tells peer-A about its tracks. We don't have that with SDP. Well, the peers have to use SOMETHING to do that. Regards, Christer
- [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC piranna@gmail.com
- Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC Bossiel thioriguel
- Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC (UNCL… Roy, Radhika R CIV USARMY (US)