IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Current state of signaling discussion

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Tue, 18 October 2011 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980D121F8B2D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.098, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PngEouR32C1J for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124C421F8B28 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAIL2.acmepacket.com (10.0.0.22) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:12:38 -0400
Received: from MAIL1.acmepacket.com ([169.254.1.230]) by Mail2.acmepacket.com ([169.254.2.157]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:12:39 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Current state of signaling discussion
Thread-Index: AQHMjZ/9v/MVYdTFIUm+RaPRMyDYcQ==
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:12:37 +0000
Message-ID: <CF311499-8ACD-471D-9B7D-C5AA24A9310C@acmepacket.com>
References: <4E9D773A.4010705@ericsson.com> <753A5B5E-45A7-46F0-98F9-B4503F4A0EF2@acmepacket.com> <4E9D85B0.6070008@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E9D85B0.6070008@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.0.0.30]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <A1C98DBC10E35E44A34C225235BCB4F3@acmepacket.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAWE=
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Current state of signaling discussion
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:12:40 -0000

On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:

> In the following message I included my clarified request on that there
> is still need to have an I-D on the "no signalling" proposal:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg01794.html

Ahhh.  Sorry I did not see that email. (I don't know how I could have missed an email in such a low-volume mailing list ;)

OK, I'll try and submit one before Friday if no one else is going to.

-hadriel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email