Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 01 November 2013 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C7011E8230 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.534
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vSELpohhuQQT for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2BB11E8221 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hm4so1435924wib.8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=49IgcPMU84vLKz8FG+7OaVD4RGqmcViy+SEPjXRCm7o=; b=qjh4AIdXqCS1NNDDanxD5KLJt8w+F2h7elZzK/pj6zYcDxXEXXlHxYGoE96wJZi210 oLCPnrBQB1BHqta6oQsy84DzVEyvSun9XfwOgHZYNh75i7gm/z7DAXnXekOa3ou00LL6 sgGK99m2b5hc6CBdWbfg1kx9yHQVj6MEVS9w99Ze5VkS4mmn6tF5neYKQuM4cdNpmvFV YSlycIyGFXlq2BaK6JdyVHliN1GYFVXE3NA5pxNl+gNhiZsbO5wwis8iv5tklhcNIwtF ldjgU3rzOM4E3e9ZhO0+ArVvhRbA8h4gUBxs8ORRy6fCytlMTTZ9dY0EuVOkhBnW9OJs 7+iQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.109.75 with SMTP id hq11mr3162738wib.30.1383328420842; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.202.194 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPvvaaJMwWHsfhJJbY-Ld488cHDY93TsBWMgV5=Ho3thN3-wtw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPvvaaLwacOgQq5O8t0bMCJJfKTHbJM9RnawgXLJpKiADtsi2Q@mail.gmail.com> <5273D5C8.304@bbs.darktech.org> <5273D848.2060608@makk.es> <5273DEEE.4000302@gmail.com> <CABkgnnWDc8BvBCC6258B2JNeA8v7D6-z7OKJNCyw68ooEK7iPA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaaJMwWHsfhJJbY-Ld488cHDY93TsBWMgV5=Ho3thN3-wtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:53:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnURQTkk-UrbCPLBYDszgocTWEuRrW+yK50xEKnTKXanww@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:53:42 -0000

On 1 November 2013 10:18, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> wrote:
>
> There are already a number of Firefox plugins out there that are
> distributed under GPL. Surely you are not saying that FF could somehow
> get in trouble for being able to run those?

I think that the only rational response is this:

IANAL

More to the point: IANAJ.