IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Working group last call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Sat, 19 December 2015 00:01 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B241A00CD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:01:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KyulNkBdDxy5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:01:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x231.google.com (mail-yk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE0EC1A00CA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:01:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 140so76650541ykp.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:01:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2Enyhcf1EMJgm9LBqpyD7v23gltbe7tl+Tf3ab+7Koo=; b=UYU+3xjVBLw7ZO2TZZVtwqeRvtIST8NIzmlhG0ATuXZ3mNP6MOytAXzrje4juGIvxU 02OvCk/bo3vD3bIltdy2SzH5PJYD9JHfqpFGQYJsctHbXzZQuqVMKdcz5B7PKBwnNZZm DmCT00CG1L+3pjZPm93i07qTKZbicNSasA0hnH6rcvdpOlwXD91/p+b+BIIoDRwVE9C9 5d7RlJOlC2fjyuxtc6+UdUVUlnd+XGaq8gIQTlPHjMImcxaY7GvBnld1fq035WarBua9 QGG5t20BK+10k2jwfEnuGcva7E0kO5VPQGSAwlkA1BqtC9o33ULDKePRGFyOuWqy5Y1w MbJg==
X-Received: by 10.129.117.84 with SMTP id q81mr5417184ywc.190.1450483307039; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:01:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (c-73-49-202-70.hsd1.fl.comcast.net. [73.49.202.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i125sm18438941ywi.28.2015.12.18.16.01.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:01:45 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-442E72A8-0D2C-435B-9263-003708CE35BE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (13C75)
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxtGC5c0Etx+LY8KPTxeHuMbUCUSLCff9=rt=1iV9TwRpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:01:43 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <4A049C42-6DBC-4C70-A704-8ECDB1CBA719@gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMDAL1mKqt7cTRmU4YqX2S5QN4RKn2cfbPaBeDgx=yiN0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxtvhaqx=H10=fUiGAjvnGAb_g89p2TZT9iNEg2F9k+6FA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMApyK4YPaWbQATy9zGfCOd3Dyfr8cY2amODgFE4XQCA=A@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxtDGUv3akJTe6ZRYNhQN=SMY_R+GeV_Kg67Y6EYq+aV=A@mail.gmail.com> <5674797A.9020102@nostrum.com> <CAD5OKxtGC5c0Etx+LY8KPTxeHuMbUCUSLCff9=rt=1iV9TwRpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/s-DkM3sEmVCp_IFCJflVKja7ANc>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Working group last call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 00:01:49 -0000

On Dec 18, 2015, at 16:47, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> wrote:
> 
> I was reminded multiple times that here is the right forum to discuss this issue. I am mostly looking for a consensus made here and then propagated to W3C.

[BA] Right. However, unless we are prepared to outlaw tones A-D in the audio document (which I would not suggest), the situation will remain much as it is now - the W3C API will need to accommodate implementations that can send those tones.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email