Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB is not SIP
Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com> Sun, 13 November 2011 11:48 UTC
Return-Path: <tim@phonefromhere.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F75B21F8B67 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 03:48:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.268
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.268 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.270, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_57=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vVgjUbITLaXK for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 03:48:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zimbra.westhawk.co.uk (zimbra.westhawk.co.uk [192.67.4.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED3721F8B44 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 03:48:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.157.49] (unknown [93.89.81.113]) by zimbra.westhawk.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1012D37A902; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:01:06 +0000 (GMT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C206DC4B-85B1-41C5-B54D-D013232C98FC"
From: Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABRok6mnCLTa+dTZQaB5DoEnQ53xT2mybEw9rtMqead1us1rbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:48:26 +0000
Message-Id: <A7F2B45C-BAA6-4259-95BB-438C36AB4E9A@phonefromhere.com>
References: <4EB26D22.5090000@ericsson.com> <FA65A239-CC86-4AC3-8A5A-91B7701C3FB5@cisco.com> <BLU152-W488BAA56546BEA4D42B4C893DF0@phx.gbl> <4EBA741A.1010307@alvestrand.no> <CAAJUQMiv3EyT3MzAUCzfXusG2Md-DnkA0sa3Hnx5CGVdh919ag@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkCQv75=ACNB2vK1Mi=S4Q=nastG_LUgd1ohzSeKmBVtQ@mail.gmail.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0134A992@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <CALiegfkZvViEmeOBpE00XyATLfRKs4EVii6UzuBFfW3a7KkNDw@mail.gmail.com> <BLU0-SMTP1090D4D5685F6B147F5A03093DD0@phx.gbl> <C0607A52-6D23-4941-8462-11A0D3510022@danyork.org> <1E43243C-4BF3-4E5A-98DD-9720558A0FAF@gmail.com> <CABRok6mnCLTa+dTZQaB5DoEnQ53xT2mybEw9rtMqead1us1rbA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: Erik Lagerway <elagerway@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB is not SIP
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:48:18 -0000
+1 (as if you hadn't guessed) On 13 Nov 2011, at 09:26, Neil Stratford wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Erik Lagerway <elagerway@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I agree. SIP should take a back seat in this WG, as should jingle etc. > > On 2011-11-11, at 10:24 AM, Dan York <dan-ietf@danyork.org> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Nov 11, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Iñaki Baz Castillo said: >>>> >>>> WebRTC is not SIP... >>>> >>>> IMHO we should stop talking about SIP in this WG.... >>> >>>> First priority is to define WebRTC regardless of federation... >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rtcweb mailing list >>> rtcweb@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >> >> -- >> Dan York dyork@lodestar2.com >> http://www.danyork.com/ skype:danyork >> Phone: +1-802-735-1624 >> Twitter - http://twitter.com/danyork >> -------------------------------------------------------- >> All comments and opinions are entirely my own and have no connection whatsoever to any employer, past or present. Indeed, by tomorrow even I might be disavowing these comments. >> -------------------------------------------------------- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rtcweb mailing list >> rtcweb@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Ravindran Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Wolfgang Beck
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB is not SIP Erik Lagerway
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Wolfgang Beck
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB is not SIP Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB is not SIP Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB is not SIP Dan York
- Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB is not SIP Tim Panton