Re: [rtcweb] Preserving stream isolation when traversing the network

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 07 March 2014 11:04 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8BA1A022B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 03:04:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tuod14DGw3oY for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 03:04:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7FC1A0200 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 03:04:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id k14so4779785wgh.11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 03:04:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Fa/R9Dpe1/Fnc2axfUACiOZ0qGVJK/Iu3euMzij/sUo=; b=utOQU/i07sWevI91n+X2XiC4oyASemJTLyncV+nalhLlzMQhGSNfXrNuLnT2fDZxsJ cUm+4vXwAsT9ZKRiR26bppaH0EDUxyWZm3EIBTAJAeT+6K0qHOp5OFiS6LtNf+DJM2A2 ex8vsDb5cuyq7RCPUs7xdzz2oGHggq6qEYUBbY0gIkzH0CagbvfuIhPdmwuet5ARLNZT UdbcUlXSREgmK+X5+iPNlFuMf19OTrCn85DKbIVF40wJRHGjMUqgtx8VZzAeQVfEqA46 EpOrsjBFqpVJ+JYQ7Vy5mXYUrcQIZKATPo8s7gToej9bi18ivz/3U41lKielqx2JNInQ VwMg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.170.167 with SMTP id an7mr18096932wjc.39.1394190284044; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 03:04:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.10.196 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 03:04:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5319A60F.4080803@alvestrand.no>
References: <CABkgnnVZpOJU=2ip88jF=sa2a7K=jBhZA0zkovPo_vvTBwA-GQ@mail.gmail.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A4844FABBEDF@TK5EX14MBXC296.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CABkgnnUrCcDS4Ty+t2gAzXUXyZPuQeqK6nqG5b-egrBwYHr9BA@mail.gmail.com> <DB348EDA-A588-47B2-8FA5-988026831DAB@phonefromhere.com> <CABkgnnXPtT-xMZY1AvkL1eeR5e2kXh0UFBbvZO+pMWXBNseqmg@mail.gmail.com> <5319A60F.4080803@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 11:04:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVzMyTLChQjteXKtszWeV3H8-z7S1AW9nrkL3EvMQybgw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/w4dhcewhVRX5tp8NbRZ3QZVnTS0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Preserving stream isolation when traversing the network
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:04:50 -0000

On 7 March 2014 10:57, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> I think that's a very specialized use case.

While I agree with much of the rest of your argument, casting this as
specialized does our future users a disservice, I think.

I appreciate that some companies consider their "value-add" to be so
compelling that isolation is something they would not consider.  That
doesn't mean that everyone will.