IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] URI schemes for TURN and STUN

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Sat, 29 October 2011 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C958311E8080; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.644
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.644 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EuZ2zQ1h8WGB; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296CD11E807F; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfo1 with SMTP id fo1so4965523vcb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.150.81 with SMTP id x17mr1410465vcv.233.1319930785403; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.184.6 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4EAC8AE0.3020307@acm.org>
References: <4EAC6BF4.2000604@alvestrand.no> <CALiegf=f4kFzyDLWK+Y5vbuCEJFXX590+VuZ4bbnHZnvX0CoBA@mail.gmail.com> <4EAC8AE0.3020307@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 01:26:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfnvM0TDcLG5_MV4UkKM3iaN6gyg5GDBsChnov33s8Q=aw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Behave WG <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] URI schemes for TURN and STUN
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:26:27 -0000

2011/10/30 Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>:
> I would like to ask the OP to
> send a pointer on the RFC or discussion that says that using a trailing "s" to
> indicate security is a bad thing.

Well, in http (so https) it's a good idea.
In SIP (using "sips" instead of "sip" schema) it's a pain nobody wants
to deal with (and there are bugs in the specifications).

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email