IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] FW: I-D Action: draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations-00.txt

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 11 March 2013 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFE121F8F8A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7k+8QhNJwyah for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBBA21F8EE6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:df8:0:16:8e70:5aff:fec5:72e4]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5850240167 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:57:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <513E372C.6060405@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:57:32 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130219 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F06040901B656@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F06040901B656@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] FW: I-D Action: draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:58:16 -0000

Le 2013-03-11 15:52, Reinaldo Penno (repenno) a écrit :
>> STUN and TURN don't require any support from ISPs.
>
> If ISPs want to provide RTCweb like services don't they need STUN and TURN
> Servers so that ICE can gather candidates?

An example of freely-accessible non-ISP STUN/TURN service: 
http://numb.viagenie.ca

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email