WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Mon, 29 October 2018 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07405130DBE; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ynIULg1IE4Aw; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6409912D4F0; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 505EE1E44B; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:52:33 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:52:32 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Cc: draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted
Message-ID: <20181029155232.GN12336@pfrc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/2-ZFN7rxCixhMi4n5Xx-DTq91IM>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:53:16 -0000

Working Group,

Reviewing my notes, I was remiss in sending out an adoption request for
draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted (Unsolicited BFD for Sessionless Applications).


This relatively minor change from the RFC 5880 spec is implemented by at
least one vendor for static route configuration.  Its security
considerations already cover what I believe to be the main concern with the
procedural change.

There's a minor point to resolve regarding the document's status - currently
Informational - with our AD.

Please indicate whether you'd support adopting this draft as a Working Group

Authors, please indicate if you're aware of any applicable IPR on it.

This adoption request will also end on Friday, November 9, IETF 103 Friday.

-- Jeff & Reshad