IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-palanivelan-bfd-v2-gr-08

Dave Katz <dkatz@juniper.net> Fri, 29 October 2010 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <dkatz@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FDC3A686C for <rtg-bfd@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.241
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.241 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.358, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CTYOFkZAV7Hq for <rtg-bfd@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og126.obsmtp.com (exprod7og126.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.206]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B373A67DB for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob126.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTMr/H4OVNRe8N9mWZi38FVoomh6Iu3AU@postini.com; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:06:39 PDT
Received: from merlot.juniper.net (172.17.27.10) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:03:57 -0700
Received: from nimbus-sf.juniper.net (nimbus-sf.juniper.net [172.16.12.139]) by merlot.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id o9TH3vb07629; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:03:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dkatz@juniper.net)
Subject: Re: draft-palanivelan-bfd-v2-gr-08
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Dave Katz <dkatz@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <D4A66B38FC6C6E4F820A2470AEEA5CED02D589FE@XMB-BGL-411.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:03:56 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <C789A153-C01A-4D46-9915-D6A01D9EE3E9@juniper.net>
References: <FB649DA20153634794BEBBAB504DA1AD4506130D74@EMBX02-BNG.jnpr.net> <C2E157D9-DB69-43D8-BB86-E148A93BA9EE@juniper.net> <D4A66B38FC6C6E4F820A2470AEEA5CED02D587DF@XMB-BGL-411.cisco.com> <624AA73F-B922-45D4-B934-1BFD9F9E629D@juniper.net> <AANLkTik2gL3Cd3jwcifCaQRmrWRWhYSZLoYuPLkb7=tv@mail.gmail.com> <C00F7E81-49DF-4515-85AF-47ED6A0ECB2D@juniper.net> <D4A66B38FC6C6E4F820A2470AEEA5CED02D589FE@XMB-BGL-411.cisco.com>
To: Palanivelan A <apvelan@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:04:45 -0000

On Oct 29, 2010, at 12:33 AM, Palanivelan A (apvelan) wrote:

> My experience with the process is not much to talk about but let me
> confirm it is not easy even to get it to Historic :).
> I loved to be part of working group in working through this document and
> unfortunately it did not happen. 
> 
> Any good suggestions in how to go about, I would love to take it Dave.

If the group thinks it to be worthwhile (I personally think it would be), it would be quite valuable to discuss the GR issues on this list, particularly any that you've run across that we did not foresee, with the goal of producing a BCP that more thoroughly documents how the various pieces of BFD and the control protocols might be pulled together to achieve GR.  If you feel that our technical evaluation of your proposal is in error, or that the existing mechanisms are insufficient and yours adds value, that would be extremely helpful as well.

Thanks,

--Dave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email