IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: BFD stability follow-up from IETF-91

Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com> Thu, 04 December 2014 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <manavbhatia@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17381AD3FF for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 06:53:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I0hEGxQ8gK06 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 06:53:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com (mail-oi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28CA91AD3BB for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 06:53:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id u20so12370490oif.41 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:53:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Aoq90yF09gmUpM+OW/bFgMtA2qc7ffw5N5uitJWyJY8=; b=PV4BAMsEdFxSvfUNRFj9xLiaAk663k0jv/5C+3+tEMe/nRGQD7xB+aLhj2Po45E6D7 PzQwNmC6eF/D75o3tP9ry6TiW2hlmS0xf4pbxb9Dkje1xnWHwqgyvsYqsi/M55TSWbQ/ 0nBkKtknbpdjDQAt7QPv/HK6HY+dN1k9EvM4gQ+T2csNycXovyVq+pzfUG62ptlcPScd +Y/BPxqk+C1VaEPtsRYvD+fV+ltZFRd1ayMlGySt+sSD6HN0Qfb6/CD8Fg77oyXkJzBW dqkaI6l+503eGiks40jh1w1svhzD+267H3m8t5akenotFvF4kKSpPQvE5tEUN7IjF86U hflg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.80.21 with SMTP id e21mr6750687oib.65.1417704801345; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:53:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.178.199 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 06:53:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CECE764681BE964CBE1DFF78F3CDD3943F5AE38D@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
References: <CO2PR0501MB823C222B7D62779F4DF58CDB3780@CO2PR0501MB823.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <D0A647C1.28843%mmudigon@cisco.com> <CO2PR0501MB8234A1BDDFD008EE12C847AB3780@CO2PR0501MB823.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CECE764681BE964CBE1DFF78F3CDD3943F5AE38D@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 20:23:21 +0530
Message-ID: <CAG1kdogkUr2YyodeUPWOqea+2jqOkmdYnPywVHCw8j1+=9eM6A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BFD stability follow-up from IETF-91
From: Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com>
To: "Nobo Akiya (nobo)" <nobo@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d840814a6450509651fb0"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/BsiIuPWTR_xEPVRfzRdBMa8tpZU
Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:53:25 -0000

Nobo - Locally storing TX/RX timestamps is not interoperable.

Cheers, Manav

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Nobo Akiya (nobo) <nobo@cisco.com> wrote:

>  A quick question to understand where we are.
>
>
>
> If we had:
>
>
>
> 1.      Standardization of Null Authentication (i.e., sequence numbers)
>
> 2.      Implementation of local TX/RX timestamp mechanism described by
> Marc below
>
>
>
> What are the core requirements which have not been satisfied?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> -Nobo
>
>
>
> P.S. No, there is no need to standardize BFD echo contents.
>
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email