IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-12

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 05 February 2018 12:26 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A387D12AF83; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 04:26:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fyGZKMjE2Fpo; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 04:26:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B34951201F2; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 04:26:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id v71so25546036wmv.2; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 04:26:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=ubDioYQF/OO2qR//dcm+8PAsUCpBO7fInYhYko4duFw=; b=iyrvBpl1EXPO8CPZ8g3/xXKnaf2P0KDw1dYZqhuGBHodk94vh3M1RiDv6K7zJm0LLm NQ47WAhg+nv/trcyWCxYwPq8jEJAnv/23ZgAeO/3de9507pgx1s8c84obWdhjIA3amQ5 tlKMzrBV2x5TtmVZrEGfr2sP8qutRws9JBop93aOZEul0Jq2Vt+BHzApEPx7B/Frua9T kma0K7lx0AKryulQJzORPFLjLea6gZW3BGQomgqfFIm/9AXYj5gIAewI+cTHPvMg+ubJ e+LoKpK1M3Jq4hABx8BduDCrQXzEAE0KcLqgJWtLHL1xF4fjtUByzi6y1wB5z+n+ZBQL M2GA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=ubDioYQF/OO2qR//dcm+8PAsUCpBO7fInYhYko4duFw=; b=SxTTrckVqAC2a9/17yTMlBMHf4RwQqfp+hDARF6QimP31fQ6K2QNuJ45Wxg5BeiwjX ryStqlTij5MG9Phi2GzvALddcGANsXqBHWmGCV4P1f2/0/ySxaNTcvWiNZuGvPaPek3c z0CP6QZeV+pVIop+6oxrgllC+jRc5nufpiUUAlS7jxTyQ3MDERen7qjS3rdTGBifBcpY BIfFVkEGSf81mJ1odhGe/ryw/xpwvrsgM/k/pjjHN8dJ0lQiXF5S0rs8ZgCLKzCsL5up DUZeCIOLAiPHEuHVs9zhLyf7NRqE+HWjF5ohPKxvFXgA7Y6UZvLunJk5lwxBJxExiizf DiwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxyteA8HD0orW241FK48oAEFDduZIhEZ+0+GxZh2CAds+Oxvg+VEEb 3siUCH90azGLO1DR+UpM3mdHFIXi
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226kSUOTyTUrIkSVVSy2d8cEhZD5b7oQCaSbAx8vyDvwYTkKxDZog6J6xBPkEeaLUTId0KZQzw==
X-Received: by 10.28.128.82 with SMTP id b79mr34790003wmd.113.1517833581181; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 04:26:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w133sm6360160wmg.5.2018.02.05.04.26.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Feb 2018 04:26:20 -0800 (PST)
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Stewart Bryant <stewart@g3ysx.org.uk>, rtg-dir@ietf.org
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process.all@ietf.org
References: <151782868264.5731.15496399706573021777@ietfa.amsl.com> <9ac4f61b-96b9-8b06-a507-9402e15e7bc6@cisco.com> <7504f257-3468-cc06-b472-33ce98393377@gmail.com> <3dc174be-9dae-b1d1-cc50-d4d2162294ba@cisco.com>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <632b5468-c757-6f31-ae29-8f1d6d2dca02@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:26:19 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3dc174be-9dae-b1d1-cc50-d4d2162294ba@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------FC99AADCC116804F190632E8"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/bbLIBtWWvfDTa44xIEcGID0rtPM>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-12
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:26:25 -0000


On 05/02/2018 12:08, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>
>
> On 05.02.18 12:02, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/02/2018 11:37, Eliot Lear wrote:
>>>> o  It MUST be possible to provision Internet Access to the Facility
>>>>        and IETF Hotels that allows local attendees to utilize the
>>>> SB> When I first read this I though you meant local as in those
>>>> SB> who live in the country, but I think you mean those at the facility.
>>>> SB> Clarification may be useful.
>>> I think this becomes clear in the following sentence.
>>
>> I still think there is scope of ambiguity. What about "physical 
>> attendees"?
>>
>
> "those attending in person:"?
>

Perfect.

  - Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email