IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG adoption for draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 18 March 2020 22:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374A83A1DCD; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 15:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wIMt081N80E6; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 15:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5E2F3A1DCF; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 15:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id r3so142386pls.13; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 15:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version; bh=7RF/T+xX/mu/qLMtClLsYDkwGywGW3isksyra0lgHaQ=; b=bemy9sLo5N9Tq4Zr2pEkWL2c9syGKBRYaxSG78jCqKXu5JtKycjXE7m4Lz+enklXmC 8xpVOZs/i1BdIjADBhlD7sSSE5LzlcTbj4w4D4AkVUVFLPmHWZQWXqM/u1XLB9W90LWW +1Os2ZJ3mGrcPN1goGtm9KPu+rsCgKZ7gsxNdTTtzjiwnTqDVLL4uljR75rCDjN/i0IO gW+9fVp5LImJU3aRI/CmyHtL3CFuiFNNb7NwU8OS81yJC7zSGHxtuvTKZeeMNL9mWJsj KkKDOwGvPlKzl9Oeq7Gyu4YA6TPbslrGLY4qtm+Ovdguau762ZNT5PDKaaXXvuAaiVZH G6TQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version; bh=7RF/T+xX/mu/qLMtClLsYDkwGywGW3isksyra0lgHaQ=; b=CxayFkJTF2u+Y4XDM4XeFx6NtHukY+hCRrDlNsU77T5jRUqm7be2dTbOrHHd2aBfvm wF/HDoAQA3oZfBoXpblaiy05UWDcmpSNoZZtf03i4d5J9NL1jwcc5kOmLWv788oIHF2+ 1UDA37gbvymMSTLrCIsl/FFj+oYq8j/mWf9xkrZavBE80HhYQPIake0WuhT5KdM1UzOO Urqv4CbgcsItSLb3DMo5cN19Q+ouiiXtQW97PM1q7wF+BXlPor+xCQc3INL1c/MJxJDX ffG2nl1fscw0spj60JdbMzAYkxZMYwiuMl0i/Zu/WgxQ3ihlMvAdKztpsXa3iGv6Gf36 efZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1aFWAc5A3SJOkgi3Bs4y5cxqE5WfEi1mV2QHZ1jhEe4D04+J0C ouk3E2s/m2F6kCmqh7wLr+KPLmeB
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vu7GI5CYBSZZpLbivDbLB3xKaUUaWHIHdykFwBKLg0wtkpcXdbAE6uqImBduoDr9fHV4OMqdQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:198b:: with SMTP id 11mr544394pji.23.1584572162817; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 15:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.25] (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q103sm3250444pjc.1.2020.03.18.15.56.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 15:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 15:55:55 -0700
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, Routing WG <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2b00e94e-9995-4a2a-812d-6de1115ae73e@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <c986b387-e6e8-46a7-8f4a-a3417de3776b@Spark>
References: <57a150fb-e91b-4581-9fc0-781e77c43e59@Spark> <c986b387-e6e8-46a7-8f4a-a3417de3776b@Spark>
Subject: Re: WG adoption for draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection
X-Readdle-Message-ID: 2b00e94e-9995-4a2a-812d-6de1115ae73e@Spark
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5e72a700_2771ac80_16f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/c-RFaZI4XOAtqEMMzHuQN85m_uA>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 22:56:05 -0000

Dear RTGWG,

The draft has been adopted as the working group document.
Authors - please republish accordingly.

I’m really happy to see good discussion and productive cooperation on the list!

Cheers,
Jeff
On Feb 20, 2020, 11:02 AM -0800, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, wrote:
> Dear RTGWG,
>
> The authors have requested RTGWG to adopt draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection as the working group document.
> The draft has received support during IETF106 meeting, authors have addressed all the comments received, I expect new version that addresses latest comments from Yimin to be uploaded within few days.
>
> Please indicate support or no-support by April 5, 2020.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
> email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
> The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not
> advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
> author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff & Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email