IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG adoption for draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection

zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn Mon, 24 February 2020 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8D33A0C1B; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 06:18:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_HDRS_LCASE=1.902, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kUN7f2HWW8pK; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 06:18:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.228]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6383A0C18; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 06:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clientip-59.41.118.40?logid-136d0bd5155d4af8a78020c35b6837a2 (unknown [172.18.0.92]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 6FDFF2800B1; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 22:17:54 +0800 (CST)
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_IP: wmail.172.18.0.92.2081318362
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: WEBMAIL
Received: from ([172.18.0.99]) by App0021 with ESMTP id 136d0bd5155d4af8a78020c35b6837a2 for rtgwg@ietf.org; Mon Feb 24 22:17:54 2020
X-Transaction-ID: 136d0bd5155d4af8a78020c35b6837a2
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.99
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 22:17:53 +0800
From: zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn
To: rtgwg <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1184872568.354115.1582553874780@localhost>
Subject: Re: WG adoption for draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_354114_1604724253.1582553873652"
HMM_WEBCLN_IP: 172.18.0.176
X-HERMES-SENDMODE: normal
X-HERMES-SET: tKSovLfYPg2Q7jEAESng/Bb49PknL3W+NiWCQSA9evQ=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/shkspeOD1GCdrkjGDq8j3svRz18>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:18:06 -0000

 
  ​Support.

Thanks.

Zhu Yongqing

From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 3:02 AM
To: RTGWG ; Routing WG
Subject: WG adoption for draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection

Dear RTGWG,

The authors have requested RTGWG to adopt draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection as the working group
The draft has received support during IETF106 meeting, authors have addressed all the comments received, I expect new version that addresses latest comments from Yimin to be uploaded within few days.

Please indicate support or no-support by April 5, 2020.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not
advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
author and each individual that has contributed to the

Cheers,
Jeff & Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email