RE: Discussion on draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp-03
"Eric Osborne (eosborne)" <eosborne@cisco.com> Tue, 28 August 2012 14:53 UTC
Return-Path: <eosborne@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB3121F853E for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.544
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.544 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5oUOMja5p0BW for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F55621F853F for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=eosborne@cisco.com; l=1371; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1346165586; x=1347375186; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=V+MlSlrzPdkSimXvzhODBVbdcVznuzv3/U7ufQyqYvw=; b=MmN1pKrVyhZomvApuPkUE2bKgGJHGFytSQC8PgVTD6DgrkYJYe26xpap NB7rAJ0ahtcDvtABvHf3K4hqdVVcYV3hko9hDdFQB/X4y5rGYMzwuVVj5 U5QUUUI8YduOkL3r2J8cCuRfohyepeR1jSA71UovOW+8LTPnXlPzOxsrb E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EADnaPFCtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABFumqBB4IgAQEBBBIBJz8MBAIBCBEEAQELFAkHMhQJCAIEAQ0FCBMHh2sLm0agR4sIhXlgA5ZqjRqBZ4Jj
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,327,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="115823202"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Aug 2012 14:53:05 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com [173.37.183.85]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7SEr5ZE008083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:53:05 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.97]) by xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com ([173.37.183.85]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:53:05 -0500
From: "Eric Osborne (eosborne)" <eosborne@cisco.com>
To: Balaji venkat Venkataswami <balajivenkat299@gmail.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Discussion on draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp-03
Thread-Topic: Discussion on draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp-03
Thread-Index: AQHNhPSNEDF+TkawGUW9spPJFh9sBZdvNwtA
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:53:05 +0000
Message-ID: <20ECF67871905846A80F77F8F4A275720F5513D8@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
References: <CAHF4apOuz3rfZ1_FLAcLAX9smGB=HbfSMPiz32zFaj+s9ALHfQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHF4apOuz3rfZ1_FLAcLAX9smGB=HbfSMPiz32zFaj+s9ALHfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.98.23.84]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19140.007
x-tm-as-result: No--30.546600-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Shankar Raman M J <mjsraman@gmail.com>, Gaurav Raina <gaurav@ee.iitm.ac.in>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:53:09 -0000
Some comments: 1) This is clearly a cut and paste of an academic paper, as your Acknowledgements indicate. This sort of stuff rarely goes anywhere in the IETF as the IETF is not a research journal. To move towards standardization you'd need support from one or more operators stating that the problem you solve is a real problem for them, and that your solution is both effective and deployable in practice. Note that this support has more heft if it comes from the operations side, not from the research department. Do you have such support? 2) Your document assumes massive amounts of cooperation between ASes, including inter-AS TE LSPs. You may want to investigate the operational feasibility of this cooperation. eric > -----Original Message----- > From: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Balaji venkat Venkataswami > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:10 AM > To: rtgwg@ietf.org > Cc: Shankar Raman M J; Gaurav Raina > Subject: Discussion on draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp-03 > > Dear all, > > We would like the working group members opinion and comments on the > following draft. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp-03 > > Please feel free to comment on the same. > > thanks and regards, > balaji venkat
- Discussion on draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp-03 Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- RE: Discussion on draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-p… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: Discussion on draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-p… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- Re: Discussion on draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-p… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- RE: Discussion on draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-p… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: Discussion on draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-p… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- Re: Discussion on draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-p… Balaji venkat Venkataswami
- Re: Discussion on draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-p… Tony Li