Re: WG Adoption Call - draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan (04/10/24

Hi, I also support adoption of the draft.

I do have a couple of small comments on Figure 2 that can be addressed
following adoption. First, the IP addresses for CPE10 wrapped to the next
line. Second, It would be better to show the IPSec tunnel between CPE1 and
CPE10 (matching the text in section 5.2) rather than between CPE1 and CPE2.

Cheers,
Andy

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 2:55 AM Shihang(Vincent) <shihang9=
40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I support the WG adoption of the draft.
>
>
>
> It evolves the SDWAN technology by leveraging the cloud as one segment.
> Since the IPSec tunnel does not terminate at the cloud GW, the processing
> is efficient.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hang
>
> *From:* rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Yingzhen Qu
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 11, 2024 2:02 AM
> *To:* RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>; rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>;
> nvo3-chairs@ietf.org; nvo3@ietf.org
> *Subject:* WG Adoption Call - draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan
> (04/10/24 - 04/26/24)
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft: draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan-07
> - Multi-segment SD-WAN via Cloud DCs (ietf.org)
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan/>
>
>
>
> After the draft was presented at IETF 119, the chairs did a poll of the
> draft, and here are the questions and results:
>
>    - "Do you think the multi-segment SD-WAN as described in the draft is
>    a use case that the IETF should work on?"
>
> yes: 20 no: 9 no_opinion: 33 total: 84
>
>
>    - "Do you support adoption of this work in RTGWG?"
>
> yes: 9 no: 9 no_opinion: 25 total: 92
>
>
>
> There is currently one IPR disclosure of this draft: IPR disclosures
> (ietf.org)
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan>
>
> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of
> any IPR that applies to the draft.
>
>
>
> The draft proposes a solution which extends GENEVE, so also copying NVO3
> WG. If you don't think the draft should be adopted in RTGWG, please voice
> your opinion.
>
>
>
> Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by Apr
> 26th, 2024.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yingzhen
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>

Re: WG Adoption Call - draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan (04/10/24 - 04/26/24)