Re: WG Adoption Call - draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan (04/10/24 - 04/26/24)

[Feng Yang <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I support the WG Adoption of the multi-segment SD-WAN draft.

As more and more requirements need both e2e encryption and path 
optimization, this draft is a good for both.

在 2024-04-11 02:01, Yingzhen Qu 写道:
> Hi,
>
> This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft: 
> draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan-07 - Multi-segment SD-WAN via Cloud 
> DCs (ietf.org) 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan/>
>
> After the draft was presented at IETF 119, the chairs did a poll of 
> the draft, and here are the questions and results:
>
>   * "Do you think the multi-segment SD-WAN as described in the draft
>     is a use case that the IETF should work on?"
>
>     yes: 20 no: 9 no_opinion: 33 total: 84
>
>   * "Do you support adoption of this work in RTGWG?"
>
>     yes: 9 no: 9 no_opinion: 25 total: 92
>
>
> There is currently one IPR disclosure of this draft: IPR disclosures 
> (ietf.org) 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan>
> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware 
> of any IPR that applies to the draft.
>
> The draft proposes a solution which extends GENEVE, so also copying 
> NVO3 WG. If you don't think the draft should be adopted in RTGWG, 
> please voice your opinion.
>
> Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by 
> Apr 26th, 2024.
>
> Thanks,
> Yingzhen
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

-- 
BR,
Feng Yang （杨锋）