Re: [Rum] [EXT] RUM security model

I think we understand why you want it. What we don’t understand is what
mechanism would provide it. I am generally aware of this class of problem
and I’m not aware of a solution that will work.  So what we need is a
suggested mechanism that provides the assurance you want that is
technically sound.

Brian

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 6:30 PM Eugene Christensen <
echristensen@sorenson.com> wrote:

> Thanks for considering how we might implement this security mechanism.
> May I add my voice that it is essential that we find an option for
> providing this desired security, whatever it is.  It could be detrimental
> to the VRS providers to have UAs out there, with the ability to register
> with VRS providers without first being fully vetted.  It is our practice
> anytime we make updates to our UAs to test how they work with our UAS
> before we ever release the new UA software into our production
> environment.  We only want UAs registering that have undergone this
> rigorous testing with our systems and then only with users which we have
> awareness of.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eugene Christensen
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files
> or previous e-mail messages attached to it, may contain confidential and
> proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person
> responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the
> information contained in or attached to this message is STRICTLY
> PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please
> immediately notify me by reply e-mail at echristensen@sorenson.com or by
> telephone at +1 (801) 287-9419, and destroy the original transmission and
> its attachments without reading them or saving them to disk.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Rum mailing list
>
> Rum@ietf.org
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rum
>
>