IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] AD Review of draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario

kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com Fri, 06 January 2017 22:21 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB4D1295C3 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:21:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fruc3YeU0FQC for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:21:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22b.google.com (mail-qt0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AADB6129587 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:21:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id l7so42161284qtd.1 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:21:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=XAKu0BPIyZUwzr9zgB8cfwZFryxc1/5eV0/gA1YVyoE=; b=aAKKaBWu3uKo5J/FgwUDnLhyCLQ4yND3oYNuIdDFYDTKQ1cPULvLDbOVD3ECx58um1 z4d7fX76kXW7c2fG3OTHV6c1ViEA+tLB9iRmXw5k6zpHcZiEKLkbBlA0JSvbuczoGXKo xvUOGetMuMXrttNJF7BxuX6nVwUp4Peq4BA9yrlqCyKC5p04TmrEvmRaQ5xXGxST5r62 VZyiBmUDZYV64xtJZSLOs6qXDUZDhxCfQbBjTDWBzS25q82bU5Mz6EF61Ue9VYlYe8/j AHRBBENRGtx/35v7MCpP3j45A3kVfu/3n/0uVblVQaimgD+nJk5J7H5P3ZgWfgAbrWZL s+fw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=XAKu0BPIyZUwzr9zgB8cfwZFryxc1/5eV0/gA1YVyoE=; b=oGKsMmKI7pDfde+Ko48615c6vsjShxphXDhvTm1cgjyR8VAnlYgouHx19rK608752N wJD14IC32Ca1yrBlIPu4zbvbN1MZynf1BCnLIa1aVQ9sLpmNJVkGjz8DUcsGmflOEkTs D4fP7IZ0Jq3DX/yDU0h+EGUd3ASXuXv1py5h4GgI5RiKIW9kq8h7EGip4S5I2qBmXfqd dWMh9RBuKt3AuAuzSrevr80UTTDSL64+XK+GIvWEIkblmM/OEP6XJ/3b8eMKVb+XvWQD /KIv84bOUNu4md1rVNanw8LoSENvUDLOeEDxOpftWrGZh2Ozme6cZcpVrsspQ0rPWrDm ovDg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIybTWWeM7S4MyNxoMs3d9TJ71P13hPsj+JtVQnE3h63lSvW632gyfpAmvcwo2CHA==
X-Received: by 10.200.51.6 with SMTP id t6mr62891526qta.75.1483741286782; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:21:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (209-6-124-204.c3-0.arl-ubr1.sbo-arl.ma.cable.rcn.com. [209.6.124.204]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y189sm416116qky.39.2017.01.06.14.21.26 for <sacm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:21:26 -0800 (PST)
From: kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-FE23BD61-E918-4157-BB57-0886C2FD8733"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 17:21:25 -0500
Message-Id: <AA331866-60E5-431A-B54A-69A1CC864268@gmail.com>
References: <CAHbuEH4CY6-DJsPSzF4HS=3dTy0bfdu9WG6uQB6N4=5vBuLbEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH6NrGDrt+JDqTMPQs-V-4Hm=7d-o===mWU2H222VG42YQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH6NrGDrt+JDqTMPQs-V-4Hm=7d-o===mWU2H222VG42YQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14C92)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/9_f1hzqGEjQ22dfv7B75OIcwYR0>
Subject: Re: [sacm] AD Review of draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 22:21:29 -0000

Thank you.  I'll go ahead then.

Best regards,
Kathleen 

Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device 

> On Jan 6, 2017, at 4:20 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Having not heard back on list any arguments to progress this draft, I will move it to a 'dead' state on Monday.  Since it is a published draft, it still can be linked from a wiki or other place where links to WG materials are managed.
> 
> Thank you,
> Kathleen
> 
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I just reviewed draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario and think it is better suited as a link off of the SACM wiki in the datatracker and can live on as an expired draft.  I don't see the value in continuing the publication process since a use case document has already been published.  If the WG really wants this published, I'll proceed, but would like to be convinced in how that will be useful.
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Kathleen
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Best regards,
> Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email