IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] AD Review of draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 06 January 2017 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF196129EFD for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:20:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q9h-xYZ6as9D for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:20:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3094129EFB for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:20:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id a20so88173528qkc.1 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:20:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5t72C1Q2ImT16tHd+3+gu24VlKE1HCcos6TOvHKvX60=; b=sSf26jHB0ovQWNZdRPHeb4Oz37ynn4JxSYL0YpX9zOLtdwF3HWAWAVp7G24ucbERpG DtupPBYBWsPilpkR4EnmlLq8GHdG48PMbekdlE8JKPWoKKXGI0KGqHuaHGNQjQouBiL4 doL5scTF3/FCa3fXpUcWgIukdoOi7amW657HR5fZlzXt5GOuBpoxw//RciUBtYSZQHk3 2u4T5zQlWgacVa4xdZjJrERIULiZGdpOZHDBhWYS5PJsfl+uPzS3k9aXhMGz18XEg2aI 6tS/KXbQi4kDzMjZSuoduvX109M6x8jjPqqxpO1y5NE568a/6vR+i66WOQKPYWt7wlcd y+6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=5t72C1Q2ImT16tHd+3+gu24VlKE1HCcos6TOvHKvX60=; b=OsUo5owR24BJDTEyWYCFb54KcbT/Zb1Pq8nEdRQFOpJ7sKfBWVIivb/1w7JZRHOnNk Kmr71mpqDmvHziZKf48e1+wCOqiZ6NYfRLA5x7NClKtfsSML3qqIHBATb2NNzZuWRacu B6UI9qGdj/Ozm5CnyAtsYisJZtO+dUaJh7+A9izXC35Qm0X2jnXVPE54LnTXpJQw5tNT ncRQAnLD5C4Ymtuv5gbWOQGqALeJdz7pNkvLK4P3sxbfM0nRdVJ16ZkLiDulPpvbjVBX yFwm1QMy8pE5X1/yTvbMmj8CLWTcJ9l64AK8d1FM2Sp38rD62JIy3mweEE/MLYuSx+QR kFlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXILkxXf/MuSrzufg5QD0qmYDJmuN/v9nS5qe2WucbMwthk7dlzlWSBwMsrlgd2JsyXYuArYwfBVGzR+zQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.215.202 with SMTP id t71mr14954631qkt.114.1483737614994; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:20:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.161.101 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:20:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH4CY6-DJsPSzF4HS=3dTy0bfdu9WG6uQB6N4=5vBuLbEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHbuEH4CY6-DJsPSzF4HS=3dTy0bfdu9WG6uQB6N4=5vBuLbEw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 16:20:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6NrGDrt+JDqTMPQs-V-4Hm=7d-o===mWU2H222VG42YQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1149971e7b545e0545739503"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/bqrskPFysmv_jA1Yx0rzlrowONA>
Subject: Re: [sacm] AD Review of draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:20:20 -0000

Hello,

Having not heard back on list any arguments to progress this draft, I will
move it to a 'dead' state on Monday.  Since it is a published draft, it
still can be linked from a wiki or other place where links to WG materials
are managed.

Thank you,
Kathleen

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <
kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I just reviewed draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario and think it is better
> suited as a link off of the SACM wiki in the datatracker and can live on as
> an expired draft.  I don't see the value in continuing the publication
> process since a use case document has already been published.  If the WG
> really wants this published, I'll proceed, but would like to be convinced
> in how that will be useful.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email