IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] AD Review of draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario

Jessica Fitzgerald-McKay <jmfmckay@gmail.com> Fri, 06 January 2017 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jmfmckay@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B89612948D for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:23:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U7Va6nhTzRqw for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:23:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x229.google.com (mail-qt0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3C42129428 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:23:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x229.google.com with SMTP id x49so25339741qtc.2 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:23:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ui+unGNOaran1ONObZU72b/RyXgdCXGVuNiqIHdh7Xw=; b=GO1+aKUv0kiK3K3zoCbY1EbaUZ7K4qNI8A3BRtm/eoM1Hl04Qm0NOBH+we7BpZNgAz KXUr7vLGZnvTN83ap1uH3Sd8152q93ONVoK4xy1iLAp760zI7LKthQRpiVaqc3koWz9N HtA3ZIEKzYZhvwRLDk8jOQ1030OnEmqwj5gnsvIldpr1SmF5iAvoC9clpV1/xDZffDWX CeFPXZa/2Wbf+yO98ve4FuKS0RpjafXitlWwHgmGw9POQzGkTFK+8XFgQGMAXaySNcg3 Kc3eRnCYOn6KsEViCxqupZ+S/F22IaHiC0bktexMrbPmfnef1uFrCFFTWUPMezA3Xojw TCdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ui+unGNOaran1ONObZU72b/RyXgdCXGVuNiqIHdh7Xw=; b=mVy0pRGrqd9OJnLGTqQ2ozXGG1q48Ozsc/IbKnX32UAAtDp4FDurZIhPS/UXsfvzkX fQiU3J8QwWQNZPOzVE01nQvciuMOhnea8E/XOMN8EZLaB7soS3FvJ/7xSLDUQ5st5UX5 +YIVEBOl4S6n7Rdy5gH5P3YSaX12pkFr2DuEl6TA52kfkd1WO3pgqnd4EmoICTIh/32C ayiT9A4lydofGksKfbHZWvvEJa3LBmoTW6oUFbtotN1j+8iTQ+neomdhaxrsAY1Gyiw8 7TkeydyOI+diiHCrwhOI3nX7sACUmm612hOvVnh2KkVuzdhlfuHOzPUSyLp1LfrgWCIb HKCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKcjnDcEtsTy2T2p7wwxV1Kfo4Wt4xdjYiY6UOCQQG+XzFQ3FCKWh5xC3RgARhVboajoRt55YwED6/fUg==
X-Received: by 10.200.44.123 with SMTP id e56mr72341806qta.122.1483741380080; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:23:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHbuEH4CY6-DJsPSzF4HS=3dTy0bfdu9WG6uQB6N4=5vBuLbEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH6NrGDrt+JDqTMPQs-V-4Hm=7d-o===mWU2H222VG42YQ@mail.gmail.com> <AA331866-60E5-431A-B54A-69A1CC864268@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AA331866-60E5-431A-B54A-69A1CC864268@gmail.com>
From: Jessica Fitzgerald-McKay <jmfmckay@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 22:22:49 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM+R6NUNsxarj4m1NnQBmfO8=E-UB1Nkx7f8NNOS+wc32cu-tA@mail.gmail.com>
To: kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113bc880e5fe100545747591"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/AEvg8rAEf7AKSAflvLQ8m4ffcWQ>
Subject: Re: [sacm] AD Review of draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 22:23:02 -0000

You too!

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, 5:21 PM <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you.  I'll go ahead then.
>
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
>
> Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device
>
> On Jan 6, 2017, at 4:20 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <
> kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Having not heard back on list any arguments to progress this draft, I will
> move it to a 'dead' state on Monday.  Since it is a published draft, it
> still can be linked from a wiki or other place where links to WG materials
> are managed.
>
> Thank you,
> Kathleen
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <
> kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I just reviewed draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario and think it is better
> suited as a link off of the SACM wiki in the datatracker and can live on as
> an expired draft.  I don't see the value in continuing the publication
> process since a use case document has already been published.  If the WG
> really wants this published, I'll proceed, but would like to be convinced
> in how that will be useful.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
>
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email