Re: [sacm] AD Review of draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario

Hi, Kathleen,

Yes, the authors agree that is the right course of action. The
Vulnerability Scenario was always intended to guide SACM internally. Sorry
for not responding on list sooner!

Thanks,
Jess

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, 4:20 PM Kathleen Moriarty <
kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Having not heard back on list any arguments to progress this draft, I will
> move it to a 'dead' state on Monday.  Since it is a published draft, it
> still can be linked from a wiki or other place where links to WG materials
> are managed.
>
> Thank you,
> Kathleen
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <
> kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I just reviewed draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario and think it is better
> suited as a link off of the SACM wiki in the datatracker and can live on as
> an expired draft.  I don't see the value in continuing the publication
> process since a use case document has already been published.  If the WG
> really wants this published, I'll proceed, but would like to be convinced
> in how that will be useful.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>