Re: [sacm] Call for adoption of draft-coffin-sacm-nea-swid-patnc as a SACM WG document

For those unfamiliar with this topic, there
is a fairly good explanation of why the old
2009 version was significantly flawed and
revised at:
http://tagvault.org/2015/06/11/isoiec-19770-2-revision-moving-to-publication/

--tony

ps. Still waiting for someone to request ISO
to make the specification publicly available
without coughing up CHF 178.  It's not that
difficult, and has been widely done for
important specifications.  It is also generally
required for standards that are imposed as
normative requirements by government.

On 2016-05-17 8:18 PM, Michael Godsey wrote:
>
> I echo the concern and question.If this points to the 2009 version, it 
> needs to be updated.Not only did we put a ton of work into revising 
> the -2 standard for 2015, but this also obsoletes the 2009 version.As 
> noted the NISTIR 8060 was based entirely on the 19770-2:2015 version, 
> leveraging the many changes implemented for better instrumentation and 
> fidelity of tag data, tag relationships, etc.
>
> *From:*sacm [mailto:sacm-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony Rutkowski
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 17, 2016 2:37 PM
> *To:* Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>; sacm@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [sacm] Call for adoption of 
> draft-coffin-sacm-nea-swid-patnc as a SACM WG document
>
> Remind us again why this ID references the 2009 version
> of ISO/IEC 19770-2, when there a 2015 apparently significantly
> different version has been adopted and is referenced in the
> NISTIR 8060 as the basis for implementations?
>
> It's interesting that the 2015 version for the GUID data
> element references 19770-5.  It's great to see it's apparently
> now publicly available at
> https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:19770:-5:ed-2:v1:en
>
> The version question seem rather significant for progressing
> the working group document.  Was there some discussion
> somewhere?
>
> --tony
>
> On 2016-05-17 12:21 PM, Karen O'Donoghue wrote:
>
>     Folks,
>
>     As discussed during our last couple of meetings, this is the
>     official call for adoption of
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-coffin-sacm-nea-swid-patnc/ as
>     a SACM working group document.
>
>     Please reply with any comments or concerns along your support of
>     this action to the mailing list.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Karen and Adam
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     sacm mailing list
>
>     sacm@ietf.org <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>

-- 

________________________________ **

*Anthony Michael Rutkowski*

EVP, Industry Standards & Regulatory Affairs

tony@yaanatech.com <mailto:tony@yaanatech.com>

+1 703 999 8270 <tel:+1%20703%20999%208270>

________________________________ **

*Yaana Technologies LLC *

542 Gibraltar Drive

Milpitas CA 95035 USA