IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] Call for adoption of draft-coffin-sacm-nea-swid-patnc as a SACM WG document

Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com> Tue, 17 May 2016 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@yaanatech.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF4912DA3E for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2016 14:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rgmDkqaFt0jy for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2016 14:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sc9-admin2.yaanatech.net (63-128-177-42-static.dzbja.com [63.128.177.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823A112D9C8 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 May 2016 14:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from extmail1.yaanatech.com (extmail1.yaanatech.com [63.128.177.51]) by sc9-admin2.yaanatech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53910C8; Tue, 17 May 2016 21:37:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.51] (pool-173-67-205-17.clppva.fios.verizon.net [173.67.205.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by extmail1.yaanatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E206058086; Tue, 17 May 2016 21:32:20 +0000 (UTC)
References: <17198AFF-DF5A-46BC-B84A-2AAF1717BD90@isoc.org>
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
From: Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com>
Organization: Yaana Technologies
Message-ID: <e8798c66-2ac8-7b24-4ab3-d28b4868c94a@yaanatech.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 17:37:05 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <17198AFF-DF5A-46BC-B84A-2AAF1717BD90@isoc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------CB5A3CF12B5B7D844A708B5B"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/uA3wd5vHAd-9R-DfrfGoE_hF5kk>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Call for adoption of draft-coffin-sacm-nea-swid-patnc as a SACM WG document
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tony@yaanatech.com
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 21:37:10 -0000

Remind us again why this ID references the 2009 version
of ISO/IEC 19770-2, when there a 2015 apparently significantly
different version has been adopted and is referenced in the
NISTIR 8060 as the basis for implementations?

It's interesting that the 2015 version for the GUID data
element references 19770-5.  It's great to see it's apparently
now publicly available at
https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:19770:-5:ed-2:v1:en

The version question seem rather significant for progressing
the working group document.  Was there some discussion
somewhere?

--tony


On 2016-05-17 12:21 PM, Karen O'Donoghue wrote:
> Folks,
>
> As discussed during our last couple of meetings, this is the official 
> call for adoption of 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-coffin-sacm-nea-swid-patnc/ as 
> a SACM working group document.
>
> Please reply with any comments or concerns along your support of this 
> action to the mailing list.
>
> Thanks,
> Karen and Adam
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email