Re: [sacm] Call for adoption of draft-coffin-sacm-nea-swid-patnc as a SACM WG document

Jerome Athias <athiasjerome@gmail.com> Wed, 18 May 2016 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <athiasjerome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1144F12D538 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2016 07:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3c590oS7wwdy for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2016 07:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com (mail-vk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A45212D16A for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 07:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id z184so64605008vkg.0 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 07:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=NAREINwe007Q+iR7VEObb1c5OACLSR5wUw0tULMbWz8=; b=D2qCciVOkMeV9stnLNKktKbxqt2B7A209oZfJc+NqTcspOHOKTZtmd3TEkNDWwZtU8 lf1WG+fDys6BGJ03E/sm5Rmt545bXQIue20MVxCrTk9SBT8OJvJHgRiBZtB5QUqlzsOD Dhszy3wwu/XGVjKbeCGkeqmXT+U+1M1pc543MvPDbxDepf+UwgDtJ3/6bO/sKsSd6q9W Jc8L+TBnKAClMe0JQpSYhIjlBcBeynAA8WUn4L4dLfl9x3YWYM9US+ty4iL2g67kXUYW o9jhhSB9LnT8ZxGiBugq71q4K1For2dQnhYwVN5ULVFrv+UnWmG0MbQTKCJfE4Yi6DxU hmUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=NAREINwe007Q+iR7VEObb1c5OACLSR5wUw0tULMbWz8=; b=dvbbs2atGBNDA/vh9djNRgyEAuTj4OxjqLOCnpSPfLw6X1HmZ6ZWodCPMuOUty/5+C Uos+f7nV1I1qn0t9bB58Q7D5p+0MHJSKzJvR1C3WZJZeb24Q5aUWyl9h55q1jN/jeqFB WyjF0s8qszCKoPadc1M9CKoXPP0ljjD9XrJFhcn3hhY8nLnu6mqLjxceZ94F/wnABURU SCWIR5kA0GLaoWkabT5nFngp7dLjZu6M7Yrk0Xu8WzsUAU3qONPRI5py8cz3beImFF0l Ibu03tch5cZxqRKld2KwVbmSmCRlwe38ADKO1EpjdhIM3Yk57eCt2iTEOPPSsJA0XYkq V69Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWUmL39KK0PXLg/u9ixyqGAOr+vBPNdlKucOImqoBzA7beNw85vRQHoUUahvbjS7M9Y6Y916QKOVlS2AA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.58.77 with SMTP id h74mr4319407vka.46.1463583501353; Wed, 18 May 2016 07:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.230.68 with HTTP; Wed, 18 May 2016 07:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0aa7684f-5a47-c00a-4b5b-e19484dd718a@yaanatech.com>
References: <17198AFF-DF5A-46BC-B84A-2AAF1717BD90@isoc.org> <e8798c66-2ac8-7b24-4ab3-d28b4868c94a@yaanatech.com> <BN1PR03MB1231A9F5A4EE487623E5C82AF490@BN1PR03MB123.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <0aa7684f-5a47-c00a-4b5b-e19484dd718a@yaanatech.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 17:58:21 +0300
Message-ID: <CAA=AuEfepDpmQF7TOLe2nvkgEPU9LD49Fc8bSvUCW+F_6yYy5A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jerome Athias <athiasjerome@gmail.com>
To: Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/i8OmM3DUfnKvqFdEIIKcXDtriYo>
Cc: Michael Godsey <mgodsey@microsoft.com>, "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Call for adoption of draft-coffin-sacm-nea-swid-patnc as a SACM WG document
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 14:58:24 -0000

Maybe a misread and difference between the Specification and the XML Schema
in 2.1.
"The SWID specification is available from ISO/IEC at
http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=53670.
The XML schema for a SWID tag file is available from ISO:
http://standards.iso.org/iso/19770/-2/2009/schema.xsd.
The most current working and production versions of the XML schema for
SWID tags can be found in the directory listing
http://standards.iso.org/iso/19770/-2/.
The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) also has
published guidelines for
   SWID tag creation, which provide further guidance for those
   interested in the use and best practices surrounding SWID tags.
   [NIST-SWID]"





2016-05-18 17:29 GMT+03:00 Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com>:
> For those unfamiliar with this topic, there
> is a fairly good explanation of why the old
> 2009 version was significantly flawed and
> revised at:
> http://tagvault.org/2015/06/11/isoiec-19770-2-revision-moving-to-publication/
>
> --tony
>
> ps. Still waiting for someone to request ISO
> to make the specification publicly available
> without coughing up CHF 178.  It's not that
> difficult, and has been widely done for
> important specifications.  It is also generally
> required for standards that are imposed as
> normative requirements by government.
>
>
> On 2016-05-17 8:18 PM, Michael Godsey wrote:
>
> I echo the concern and question.   If this points to the 2009 version, it
> needs to be updated.  Not only did we put a ton of work into revising the -2
> standard for 2015, but this also obsoletes the 2009 version.  As noted the
> NISTIR 8060 was based entirely on the 19770-2:2015 version, leveraging the
> many changes implemented for better instrumentation and fidelity of tag
> data, tag relationships, etc.
>
>
>
> From: sacm [mailto:sacm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tony Rutkowski
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 2:37 PM
> To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>; sacm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [sacm] Call for adoption of draft-coffin-sacm-nea-swid-patnc as
> a SACM WG document
>
>
>
> Remind us again why this ID references the 2009 version
> of ISO/IEC 19770-2, when there a 2015 apparently significantly
> different version has been adopted and is referenced in the
> NISTIR 8060 as the basis for implementations?
>
> It's interesting that the 2015 version for the GUID data
> element references 19770-5.  It's great to see it's apparently
> now publicly available at
> https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:19770:-5:ed-2:v1:en
>
> The version question seem rather significant for progressing
> the working group document.  Was there some discussion
> somewhere?
>
> --tony
>
> On 2016-05-17 12:21 PM, Karen O'Donoghue wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
>
>
> As discussed during our last couple of meetings, this is the official call
> for adoption of
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-coffin-sacm-nea-swid-patnc/ as a SACM
> working group document.
>
>
>
> Please reply with any comments or concerns along your support of this action
> to the mailing list.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Karen and Adam
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> sacm mailing list
>
> sacm@ietf.org
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ________________________________
>
> Anthony Michael Rutkowski
>
> EVP, Industry Standards & Regulatory Affairs
>
> tony@yaanatech.com
>
> +1 703 999 8270
>
> ________________________________
>
> Yaana Technologies LLC
>
> 542 Gibraltar Drive
>
> Milpitas CA 95035 USA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>