IETF Logo Mail Archive

[SAFE] nat-control-stun-usage-04

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Wed, 10 October 2007 19:32 UTC

Return-path: <safe-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IfhIQ-0001Rg-3U; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:32:42 -0400
Received: from safe by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IfhIN-00014U-VJ for safe-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:32:39 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IfhIJ-0000xJ-Ee for safe@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:32:35 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IfhII-00081C-VT for safe@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:32:35 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,255,1188802800"; d="scan'208";a="405375777"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2007 12:32:34 -0700
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (sj-core-4.cisco.com [171.68.223.138]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9AJWYL1023260 for <safe@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:32:34 -0700
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.32.240.195]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l9AJWXpH003194 for <safe@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:32:33 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: safe@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:32:37 -0700
Message-ID: <042001c80b74$509c46b0$c3f0200a@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
Thread-Index: AcgLbNxFEbzYYiATRru6vIm1L1ePxQAAbM5A
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=627; t=1192044754; x=1192908754; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20nat-control-stun-usage-04 |Sender:=20; bh=cEungfNMd1PYNtHNB/nSXG8xrQ2xTpgYsCAO1JXtl0U=; b=nptDsKPkp7vZ6H4nfhVHizMYKHdP3+xELAdOGy5HjXQWmbfOR1J6bWILiZAAlQfhH3Hyjj76 vNQTMC2NtjNWT6mvM85fIRUIWqMi97j4DCDJJ2wCiJAmB+R0uKzsm/Q8/FX8CgLcAhJ53aVNTX /tLUa0A6IiOLpMWCMnRcJRTq8=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Subject: [SAFE] nat-control-stun-usage-04
X-BeenThere: safe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Self-Address Fixing Evolution <safe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/safe>, <mailto:safe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/safe>
List-Post: <mailto:safe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:safe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/safe>, <mailto:safe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: safe-bounces@ietf.org

We just submitted a new version of STUN Control,
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wing-behave-nat-control-stun-usage-0
4.txt

The changes were mostly organizational and editorial, and included:

   o  Clarified that all existing bindings, for that source IP address
      and UDP port, are controlled with STUN Control.

   o  Introduction now concentrates on the primary purpose of STUN
      Control, namely reducing keepalive traffic for SIP-Outbound.

There is also an appendix which describes Linux implementation specifics.

Diffs are at:
  http://www.tinyurl.com/2bak33

Comments welcome,
-d


_______________________________________________
SAFE mailing list
SAFE@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/safe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email