Re: [savi] Call for WG items for a potential rechartering

"Jun Bi" <junbi@cernet.edu.cn> Wed, 29 June 2011 04:59 UTC

Return-Path: <junbi@cernet.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1DA21F863C for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HAS_XAIMC=2.696, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ClOckmBNDdFv for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cernet.edu.cn (mail.cernet.edu.cn [202.112.39.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EB40121F863A for <savi@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from junbiVAIOz138([59.66.24.102]) by cernet.edu.cn(AIMC 3.2.0.0) with SMTP id jm74e0ace08; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:59:22 +0800
Message-ID: <48961EFFA8574BE9BA6E223E697913C1@junbiVAIOz138>
From: Jun Bi <junbi@cernet.edu.cn>
To: Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>, SAVI Mailing List <savi@ietf.org>
References: <BANLkTimtNw0DWHMqY6sh1QEkBLLYSag9xg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikhnT6nfANdYS=4NN-VoNj8jn_eTg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikhnT6nfANdYS=4NN-VoNj8jn_eTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:59:14 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3508.1109
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3508.1109
X-AIMC-AUTH: junbi
X-AIMC-MAILFROM: junbi@cernet.edu.cn
X-AIMC-Msg-ID: MJyrmb0B
Cc: int-ads@tools.ietf.org, Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [savi] Call for WG items for a potential rechartering
X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF <savi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/savi>
List-Post: <mailto:savi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 04:59:49 -0000

Hi WG chairs,

What do you mean

- To allow a potential "rechartering" in the future for needed new 
mechanisms (e.g. MIB, etc.).

thanks,
Jun Bi

-----原始邮件----- 
From: Jean-Michel Combes
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:50 AM
To: SAVI Mailing List
Cc: int-ads@tools.ietf.org ; Christian Vogt
Subject: Re: [savi] Call for WG items for a potential rechartering

Folks,

Based on received feedback, and in conjunction with ADs, SAVI chairs 
decided:
(1) No SAVI meeting during the next IETF meeting in Quebec
- Not enough manpower to launch a rechartering
- Not enough potential items for a rechartering
- All present issues regarding WG documents should be easily solved on the 
ML
(2) Close the WG after the finalization of the RFC process for present
WG documents but keep the mailing list alive
- To get potential feedback from SAVI implementations/deployments
- To allow a potential "rechartering" in the future (like what has
been done in the past for the send/csi WGs or for ipsec/ipsecme WGs)
for needed new mechanisms (e.g. MIB, etc.)

Best regards.

SAVI chairs.

2011/6/6 Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>:
> Folks,
>
> As promised during the last SAVI meeting in Prague, to prepare the
> next IETF meeting, I would like to know whether WG members believe
> there are still open issues the WG needs to work on or not.
>
> If so, please, reply to this email, providing a clear description of
> the item and your contribution (i.e. Editor, Co-Author, Reviewer). For
> each proposed item, at least three volunteers ready to review the
> future document are requested.
>
> If you believe the WG has finished the work and can be closed, don't
> hesitate to tell it too.
>
> The deadline to reply is 2011-06-20.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best regards.
>
> JMC.
>
_______________________________________________
savi mailing list
savi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi