IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [savi] Call for WG items for a potential rechartering

Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com> Wed, 29 June 2011 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5574511E8081 for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.034
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.034 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.565, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GXtlWvOLP8qU for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yi0-f44.google.com (mail-yi0-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB17F9E8024 for <savi@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yie30 with SMTP id 30so518206yie.31 for <savi@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=waBwaiY33xX2rHN0WufkgPP2xJo2eCEXTiogrpzdADo=; b=M0MwFBqi3I3n3H129WBL4o6vTEcfjttYp3bEr3FOP7eZj4j6A8JGU3QUvM4zqEPp4S Y6/5O8uhJIt+RgI8qpnl1eQ3LzRG5Lr/BqshtWmEEcOEJHAAAJNi9v/omF8Ej7Maptml Pcr/mOeXadZ3FbN3hYOma+Yglh3OXgEXbkkyw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.193.2 with SMTP id q2mr508286ybf.81.1309338051836; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.147.182.9 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <48961EFFA8574BE9BA6E223E697913C1@junbiVAIOz138>
References: <BANLkTimtNw0DWHMqY6sh1QEkBLLYSag9xg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikhnT6nfANdYS=4NN-VoNj8jn_eTg@mail.gmail.com> <48961EFFA8574BE9BA6E223E697913C1@junbiVAIOz138>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:00:51 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=XrO_DAoKVoaVMa3_=-FCOQfVFNQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>
To: Jun Bi <junbi@cernet.edu.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: int-ads@tools.ietf.org, SAVI Mailing List <savi@ietf.org>, Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [savi] Call for WG items for a potential rechartering
X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF <savi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/savi>
List-Post: <mailto:savi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:00:53 -0000

Hi Jun,

If there would be enough support in the future to work on new
mechanisms and people would think these mechanisms should become IETF
Standards, the ML will be the right place to initiate such a work.

Now, don't forget that in parallel, there is also personal submission
(i.e. AD shepherded/RFC Editor) for Experimental/Informational
proposals.

Is it clearer?

Best regards.

JMC.

2011/6/29 Jun Bi <junbi@cernet.edu.cn>:
> Hi WG chairs,
>
> What do you mean
>
> - To allow a potential "rechartering" in the future for needed new
> mechanisms (e.g. MIB, etc.).
>
> thanks,
> Jun Bi
>
> -----原始邮件----- From: Jean-Michel Combes
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:50 AM
> To: SAVI Mailing List
> Cc: int-ads@tools.ietf.org ; Christian Vogt
> Subject: Re: [savi] Call for WG items for a potential rechartering
>
> Folks,
>
> Based on received feedback, and in conjunction with ADs, SAVI chairs
> decided:
> (1) No SAVI meeting during the next IETF meeting in Quebec
> - Not enough manpower to launch a rechartering
> - Not enough potential items for a rechartering
> - All present issues regarding WG documents should be easily solved on the
> ML
> (2) Close the WG after the finalization of the RFC process for present
> WG documents but keep the mailing list alive
> - To get potential feedback from SAVI implementations/deployments
> - To allow a potential "rechartering" in the future (like what has
> been done in the past for the send/csi WGs or for ipsec/ipsecme WGs)
> for needed new mechanisms (e.g. MIB, etc.)
>
> Best regards.
>
> SAVI chairs.
>
> 2011/6/6 Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> As promised during the last SAVI meeting in Prague, to prepare the
>> next IETF meeting, I would like to know whether WG members believe
>> there are still open issues the WG needs to work on or not.
>>
>> If so, please, reply to this email, providing a clear description of
>> the item and your contribution (i.e. Editor, Co-Author, Reviewer). For
>> each proposed item, at least three volunteers ready to review the
>> future document are requested.
>>
>> If you believe the WG has finished the work and can be closed, don't
>> hesitate to tell it too.
>>
>> The deadline to reply is 2011-06-20.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>> JMC.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> savi mailing list
> savi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email