Re: [scim] [⚠️] Call for support on proposed SCIM/SINS (re)charter

Alice Wang <awang@zscaler.com> Fri, 10 September 2021 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <awang@zscaler.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451783A1BEE for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=zscaler.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SvvhZXihhcry for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52C623A1BE7 for <scim@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id v1so1943947plo.10 for <scim@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zscaler.com; s=google; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=VHDaJQtMEJjiB+eA4jHZAy6aD3c2k9xafc+A9kw32E4=; b=cCgpKpxbz6ps1Y+lCamj31yTk00gcWHgQ37Ouc/+JjqnXRZhrjjxYAWy8BgivnNyej iAfloCaDdw57E8TvJDdjnXzfAzwPGS/N1UoCyXMvXR3Psvunx1JMgKTzQG9eoIL3OIPs zJVUz0i/cu5cYP5xCPE5/WK00nksBJb5rmBKU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=VHDaJQtMEJjiB+eA4jHZAy6aD3c2k9xafc+A9kw32E4=; b=VUb/IdW/w6b+7ER4js56oXQJUuCHOpcR0nypt1bcn+JUTRInThOE8msWMJPJfPZEtr ymrmMkXWwn1ZRZaipVztXfntvngCxi00tRK36yJlSMBjleXwQQllD6+P57aTWbNSSU4Q shtnHellurfNThakoNM8T1Pd2Oym9bhFw1Krpnzk3+2Yh/PDiIR5r2vKERne5rDhUZZ/ 1d6RdQ15eQL0EU1wXdV4lWwPPyOgu5vvO7TqyVFFlGUuLaLW7DmO9ylTDv8uf1yTfDmU rjWO371wRfPxviSBJqb3IRYyPjFD6dm9nxUjIKPLL+MyNob85rf77UKVe8EzzRuCQbL6 ql6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531S5lIrlw0aM47HZ02VvEZDQ+A0eI/cTKsmWcy84xNKC8jRNxu4 72XS4M61TtE9OAjzQU3adg773zB4HrBmpA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJynkaPBzX7KG2/TYpuG9drgFJYtfaokVJPabpjXGyQ1ElyP4DZLzGskZSuQYAjKwx32yzRIMQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ab90:: with SMTP id n16mr11523281pjq.157.1631308396356; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alices-mbp.localdomain (d207-216-177-38.bchsia.telus.net. [207.216.177.38]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k4sm6214038pga.92.2021.09.10.14.13.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alice Wang <awang@zscaler.com>
Message-Id: <3D8921A4-3EB5-4516-8F93-95C0771115AF@zscaler.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4937EAAF-0D81-445D-9997-899D9A3B19C4"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\))
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:13:15 -0700
In-Reply-To: <9BCA478F-548E-4F6A-9F1B-6D8E15AE9373@cisco.com>
Cc: "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>
To: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <9BCA478F-548E-4F6A-9F1B-6D8E15AE9373@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.40.0.2.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/12QufnvIqAvOYrWF_DEHwv5x8_w>
Subject: Re: [scim] [⚠️] Call for support on proposed SCIM/SINS (re)charter
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scim/>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 21:13:24 -0000

I support this charter.  I could help to review the document and may also work on some sample implementation if needed.

Thanks

Alice



> On Sep 8, 2021, at 5:21 PM, Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <ncamwing=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello SCIM participants,
>  
> After some virtual meetings (thank you Pam for hosting these!) and discussion, there is a new proposed charter that addresses the points raised at the IETF 111 SINS session. 
> This is a call for support of the charter defined below, please provide your response by Sept. 24, 2021. 
>  
> As you respond in support for the charter, please also specify if you are willing to produce, review and/or implement the resulting documents.
> Otherwise, do provide feedback in the time window if there are concerns or issues you see with the charter below:
>  
> Charter
> 
> The System for Cross-domain Identity Management (SCIM) specification is an HTTP-based protocol that makes managing identities in multi-domain scenarios easier. SCIM was last published in 2015 and has seen growing adoption.
> 
> One goal for this working group is to shepherd SCIM, currently RFC series 7642 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7642>, 7643 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7643>, 7644 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7644>, through the Internet Standard process. The group will deliver revised specifications for the SCIM requirements as Informational, and for the SCIM protocol and base schema suitable for consideration as a Standard. This work will be based upon the existing RFCs, errata and interoperabilty feedback, and incorporate current security and privacy best practices.
> 
> In addition to revising the requirements, protocol and base schema RFCs, the group will also consider additional specifications as extensions to SCIM that have found broad adoption and are ready for standards track. This includes profiles and schemas for interoperability in additional scenarios. The working group will develop additional Proposed Standard RFCs based on outcomes of the following work:
> 
> Revision of the informational RFC 7642 will:
> Focus on Use cases and implementation patterns
> Pull vs. Push based use cases
> Events and signals use cases
> Deletion use cases
> New use cases may be added to the revised RFC
> Revision of RFC 7643/44 will include:
> Profiling SCIM relationships with other identity-centric protocols such as OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, Shared Signals, and Fastfed
> Updates to the evolution of the externalid usage
> Document SCIM support for synchronization-related goals between domains focused on:
> Handling returning large result sets through paging, based on [draft-hunt-scim-mv-paging-00]
> Incremental approaches to synchronization
> Support for deletion-related goals including:
> Handling Deletes in SCIM Servers that don’t allow Deletes (Soft Deletes) - based on [draft-ansari-scim-soft-delete-00]
> Support for advanced automation scenarios such as:
> Discovery and negotiation of client credentials
> Attribute mapping
> Per-attribute schema negotiation
> Enhance the existing schema to support exchanging of HR, Enterprise group and privileged access management (using draft-grizzle-scim-pam <https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-grizzle-scim-pam-ext-00.html> as a base)
>  
> Best, Nancy (as one of the BoF chairs)
>  
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>