IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [scim] Proposal to create a design team

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Fri, 19 October 2012 06:48 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED45921F846A for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.199, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4+9Y7qXBpjoX for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E68821F8620 for <scim@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b11so105903lam.31 for <scim@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to:x-gm-message-state; bh=3IFr9b/mhgr/usNMmuuikPKQjsk3jVg5Ie4oDemVm/k=; b=omJkkcmLupNFW5oCgjzeDwo/pOExShupjdK1BP8KCcKW4urRu5/swts93+zw/LWr0W ojwZT+LNKhtmcnO+m/9Ot41kozxlOVQnr5wtwjQfk76SJZ/sd5TwpWRSKw+VS6iFiaiz NfRievMvgs/l82d8ewyjLvjas5mb1pwPSzazmb7jUqn7DofIWmPphTfqU1WiIUTSQ2l8 J00uEfNT8tFlZFR9LTVnVE3T9SgpnpHlFw8ywy0rpP22ve71cb/kdKrXWjAm/kbUKDRN Awsw060RITtYJD9kqjGrZuITZsUovVdB7RQ3rcHqDiMT4lbGCBoVdvxSqQzP2TDa7RXL 8pFQ==
Received: by 10.152.105.103 with SMTP id gl7mr307064lab.10.1350629294436; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.232] (ua-83-227-179-169.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se. [83.227.179.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j9sm301563lbk.17.2012.10.18.23.48.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CA3B67220D628A4780D6FEB31F18A3E32379CB76@xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com> <50766F04.6090901@gmx.net> <507691DB.1050204@mnt.se> <50802113.4040805@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <50802113.4040805@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-8B5164C5-D365-45AF-941B-0BD78D4AC68E"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E43A1E0C-AAB6-4682-AF26-E6A58F79E48C@mnt.se>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10A403)
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:48:06 +0200
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnct1OdcRcbCvuC5yAx2Hs/W1MfXFL997fS9nc9VtYZSi8LGP+6crohWwvxPpbZsBZnc/j/
Cc: "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [scim] Proposal to create a design team
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scim>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 06:48:17 -0000


18 okt 2012 kl. 17:32 skrev Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>:

> Leif, Morteza,
> 
> I'm sorry to be a stick in the mud, but I don't understand the objective of this design team.  Let's start with an easy question:
> What work are they supposed to do?  What issues are they supposed to address?
> Put another way, I was not of the understanding that what is posted is a strawman, but based on running code.  If there is running code, it seems to me that the onus is on those in the WG to state issues.  There are a number, as I understand it.  A design team is necessary when something needs to be designed.  What here needs to be designed
> 

The chairs believe that the scim comminity see a need for a version 2.0 that involve more than minor incremental changes from what we have now. In our opinion a design team will help the wg start to converge more quickly. 

The chairs also fully expect the group to be reduced in size very quckly as it was clear on the first call that all who volunteered were not actually able to spend the time.

In the meantime please continue identifying issues!

> Now to answer my question in part, there is this dangling reference to ServiceProviderConfigs.  Is that needed or should it be removed?
> I guess what I'm asking for is just a bit more scope, please.
> Eliot
> 
> On 10/11/12 11:31 AM, Leif Johansson wrote:
>> On 10/11/2012 09:02 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>> > Hi chairs,
>> 
>> > Are we talking about this document: 
>> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-scim-api/
>> 
>> > Looks like a strawman proposal to me already right now.
>> 
>> We are talking about a strawman for the next major revision of
>> that document and the schema document.
>> 
>> It is great to see so many are willing to participate. Please
>> note that participation in a design-team requires active
>> participation and time comittment.
>> 
>>     Best R
>>     Leif
> >
>       _______________________________________________
> 
>       > scim mailing list
> 
>       > scim@ietf.org
> 
>       > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
> 
>       >
> 
>       >
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email