Re: [scim] Feedback and adoption readiness for draft-zollner-scim-roles-entitlements-extension

I love this - we use roles currently and having a more formal spec and
ability for the client to read what's available could come in very handy in
the future.  So mark me down as a 5.

However, these resources not including the common attributes set mandated
by RFC 7643 section 3.1 should be explained/clarified in the RFC.  The
Apache SCIMple library will have to handle these resources as special-cases
since they won't have the required "id" field, for example.  That seems
major enough to justify a paragraph.

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>
> To: SCIM WG <scim@ietf.org>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 23:40:10 +0000
> Subject: [scim] Feedback and adoption readiness for
> draft-zollner-scim-roles-entitlements-extension
>
> Hello SCIMers,
>
>
>
> We need feedback on to gauge support and adoption readiness of:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zollner-scim-roles-entitlements-extension/
>
> Please respond to this thread on the following:
>
>
>
>
>
>   1.  You have read the draft and believe it is ready to be adopted by the working group. Any other feedback on the content of the draft is welcomed too.
>
>   2.  You are willing to be an active contributor or reviewer of the document
>
>   4.  You support the draft and plan to implement
>
>   5.  You support the draft but have no time or plans to implement now, but can provide feedback
>
>   6.  You have no interest in the draft
>
>
>
> Please provide your feedback by November 28th.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>    Nancy
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Paul Lanzi <paul@remediant.com>
> To: SCIM WG <scim@ietf.org>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 16:50:26 -0700
> Subject: Re: [scim] Feedback and adoption readiness for
> draft-zollner-scim-roles-entitlements-extension
> #4 for me.
> Thanks,
> --Paul
> ᐧ
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 4:40 PM Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <ncamwing=
> 40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello SCIMers,
>>
>>
>>
>> We need feedback on to gauge support and adoption readiness of:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zollner-scim-roles-entitlements-extension/
>>
>> Please respond to this thread on the following:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   1.  You have read the draft and believe it is ready to be adopted by the working group. Any other feedback on the content of the draft is welcomed too.
>>
>>   2.  You are willing to be an active contributor or reviewer of the document
>>
>>   4.  You support the draft and plan to implement
>>
>>   5.  You support the draft but have no time or plans to implement now, but can provide feedback
>>
>>   6.  You have no interest in the draft
>>
>>
>>
>> Please provide your feedback by November 28th.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>    Nancy
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> scim mailing list
>> scim@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>>
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>

-- 

Chad Vincent (he/him) | Software Engineer, Senior - CrashPlan

chad.vincent@crashplan.com

400 S 4th St Suite 410 PMB 31083 Minneapolis, MN 55415-1419

<https://crashplan.com>