Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging

[Behcet Sarikaya <[e-mail]>]

Pat R. Calhoun wrote:

>  
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> So we are calling a WG last call on the assessment document
> (draft-ietf-seamoby-paging-protocol-assessment-01.txt). We encourage
> folks to provide their *technical* comments on the draft should they
> believe that the findings of the assessment team are incorrect. We do
> ask the WG members to kindly refrain from posting any process related
> comments, since it detracts us from achieving our milestones. Once
> the WG last call is complete, we will collect the comments that have
> WG concensus and make any necessary changes to the draft. The WG last
> call ends February 25th.
>
> The end result is that the WG will get to decide which document is to
> be used as the *starting point*.
>
> Thanks for your patience,
>
> PatC & jak
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use < http://www.pgp.com >
>
> iQA/AwUBPFrawTN1fXKoxmisEQIaWQCfYIis0Nsd52Q0Xv7wA77/RWn4J9IAn0t2
> FoREK4Kavht9sSs7VjZIhLlV
> =EmAk
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Dear all,
  Based on the technical evaluation of all the drafts I posted in a 
previous mail on this thread, I propose draft-guri as the starting 
point. This draft uses all the entities of the requirements architecture 
and it does not make any assumptions on the mobility protocol mapping. 
This means the text from other drafts (security from draft-ohba, 
time-slot based paging from draft-sarikaya, mipv6 mappings from 
draft-renker and draft-koodli) can be easily incorporated. Along with 
its own goodies of the triggers, draft-guri would make a perfect 
starting point.
  My 2 euro cents.

-- 
Behcet