[Seamoby] Moving forward with paging
"Pat R. Calhoun" <pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com> Fri, 01 February 2002 18:32 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA06944 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:32:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA01635; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:13:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA01607 for <seamoby@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:13:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from EXCHSRV.stormventures.com ([65.107.25.226]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA06407 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:13:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: by EXCHSRV.stormventures.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <1B7WAVVF>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:13:22 -0800
Message-ID: <DC6C13921CCAFB49BCB8461164A3F4E38D24D9@EXCHSRV.stormventures.com>
From: "Pat R. Calhoun" <pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com>
To: seamoby@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 10:13:20 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C1AB4C.21697C70"
Subject: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 All, As many of you know, last week we asked the WG for their comments on how to proceed with the paging work. A summary of the comments that came in is: Start from a known protocol - 5 Reopen selection phase - 3 Design team to start from scratch - 2 Drop the work altogether - 1 Many did not give opinions obviously, and these numbers are not to be viewed as a "vote" (our AD reminds us that rough consensus is not voting). But considering the 5 and 3, there is at least a preference for starting with a candidate, rather than from scratch. So the issue that needs to be resolved is which protocol should be used, since the protocol assessment wasn't conclusive, the chairs had picked one based on the findings of the assessment team. However, since an (admitedly useless) numbering rating scheme was used in the assessment, it was hard to really determine which protocol should be used. After discussing the matter ourselves, and with our AD, Allison, we decided to revise the paging assessment draft and remove the useless numerical ratings. This means that each draft must now be assessed using just technical merit. Further, a new section has been added to the document stating the chairs' basis (including charter reasons) for viewing the Renker draft as the starting point most likely to get us to the requirements and to a IETF-quality protocol... So we are calling a WG last call on the assessment document (draft-ietf-seamoby-paging-protocol-assessment-01.txt). We encourage folks to provide their *technical* comments on the draft should they believe that the findings of the assessment team are incorrect. We do ask the WG members to kindly refrain from posting any process related comments, since it detracts us from achieving our milestones. Once the WG last call is complete, we will collect the comments that have WG concensus and make any necessary changes to the draft. The WG last call ends February 25th. The end result is that the WG will get to decide which document is to be used as the *starting point*. Thanks for your patience, PatC & jak -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBPFrawTN1fXKoxmisEQIaWQCfYIis0Nsd52Q0Xv7wA77/RWn4J9IAn0t2 FoREK4Kavht9sSs7VjZIhLlV =EmAk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Pat R. Calhoun
- RE: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging john.loughney
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Behcet Sarikaya
- RE: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Pat R. Calhoun
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Marco Liebsch
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Marco Liebsch
- RE: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Pat R. Calhoun
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Behcet Sarikaya
- RE: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Pat R. Calhoun
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Marco Liebsch
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Behcet Sarikaya
- RE: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Pat R. Calhoun
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Marco Liebsch
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Behcet Sarikaya
- RE: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Pat R. Calhoun
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Marco Liebsch
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Behcet Sarikaya
- RE: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Pat R. Calhoun
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Marco Liebsch
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging -resendiā¦ Behcet Sarikaya
- RE: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Pat R. Calhoun
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging Behcet Sarikaya
- RE: [Seamoby] Moving forward with paging rene.purnadi