Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane-04

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Wed, 15 December 2010 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BA628C0F2; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:38:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.289, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cL81ow2bbXeW; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:38:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F5528C163; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:38:23 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,350,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="193238651"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2010 17:40:04 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-102.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-102.cisco.com [72.163.62.139]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBFHe3ps006319; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:40:03 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-206.cisco.com ([72.163.62.213]) by xbh-rcd-102.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:40:03 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:40:01 -0600
Message-ID: <960EC8F9A775AB40BF58D8953342D86303756F52@XMB-RCD-206.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <000f01cb9c17$d48de140$7da9a3c0$@net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: secdir review of draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane-04
Thread-Index: AcubmuPX8ApT8oTvQH25nvfDEry6vAAfM8nwABnYTqA=
References: <001201cb9b59$acd02d70$06708850$@net> <DCC6725D-0C45-47BD-AC49-A38A256A75A8@hopcount.ca> <4D077C47.4010506@cisco.com> <5C11F4B2-00A9-4C5C-BA19-417756547632@hopcount.ca> <000f01cb9c17$d48de140$7da9a3c0$@net>
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: "Glen Zorn" <gwz@net-zen.net>, "Joe Abley" <jabley@hopcount.ca>, "Rodney Dunn (rodunn)" <rodunn@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Dec 2010 17:40:03.0655 (UTC) FILETIME=[1AEA8D70:01CB9C7F]
Cc: draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane@tools.ietf.org, opsec-chairs@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:38:31 -0000

This helps. Thanks !

-----Original Message-----
From: Glen Zorn [mailto:gwz@net-zen.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 12:21 AM
To: 'Joe Abley'; Rodney Dunn (rodunn)
Cc: iesg@ietf.org; secdir@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane@tools.ietf.org;
opsec-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane-04

Joe Abley [mailto:jabley@hopcount.ca] writes:

..

> > "Permit RADIUS authentication and accounting replies from RADIUS
> servers 198.51.100.9, 198.51.100.10, 2001:DB8:100::9, and
> 2001:DB8:100::10 that are listening on UDP ports 1812 and 1813. Note
> that this doesn't account for a server using the commonly deployed
pre-
> standard UDP ports of 1812 and 1813."
> 
> I think you mean "1645 and 1646" in the final sentence.
> 
> I would also drop "commonly deployed" since I think the phrase is
> subjective and difficult to qualify, and replace "account for" with
> "accommodate" since one of the ports you're opening a hole for is for
> accounting and different uses of the same word seems worth avoiding
> (e.g. for non-English speakers).

Good idea.