Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane-04

"Glen Zorn" <gwz@net-zen.net> Wed, 15 December 2010 05:19 UTC

Return-Path: <gwz@net-zen.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191B83A6E01 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:19:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.372
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.372 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.227, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pKc-MorjPfUh for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:19:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpout05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout05-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.218]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DF133A6DA6 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:19:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 9416 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2010 05:20:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (124.120.200.9) by smtpout05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.218) with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2010 05:20:53 -0000
From: "Glen Zorn" <gwz@net-zen.net>
To: "'Joe Abley'" <jabley@hopcount.ca>, <rodunn@cisco.com>
References: <001201cb9b59$acd02d70$06708850$@net> <DCC6725D-0C45-47BD-AC49-A38A256A75A8@hopcount.ca> <4D077C47.4010506@cisco.com> <5C11F4B2-00A9-4C5C-BA19-417756547632@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <5C11F4B2-00A9-4C5C-BA19-417756547632@hopcount.ca>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:20:43 +0700
Organization: Network Zen
Message-ID: <000f01cb9c17$d48de140$7da9a3c0$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcubmuPX8ApT8oTvQH25nvfDEry6vAAfM8nw
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane@tools.ietf.org, opsec-chairs@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 05:19:14 -0000

Joe Abley [mailto:jabley@hopcount.ca] writes:

...

> > "Permit RADIUS authentication and accounting replies from RADIUS
> servers 198.51.100.9, 198.51.100.10, 2001:DB8:100::9, and
> 2001:DB8:100::10 that are listening on UDP ports 1812 and 1813. Note
> that this doesn't account for a server using the commonly deployed pre-
> standard UDP ports of 1812 and 1813."
> 
> I think you mean "1645 and 1646" in the final sentence.
> 
> I would also drop "commonly deployed" since I think the phrase is
> subjective and difficult to qualify, and replace "account for" with
> "accommodate" since one of the ports you're opening a hole for is for
> accounting and different uses of the same word seems worth avoiding
> (e.g. for non-English speakers).

Good idea.