Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-path-key-ero-03

sandy@tislabs.com (Sandy Murphy) Tue, 03 February 2009 01:37 UTC

Return-Path: <secdir-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secdir-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F93D3A690D; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:37:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4803A6A05; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:37:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.281, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56qQYfftaEqy; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:37:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nutshell.tislabs.com (nutshell.tislabs.com [192.94.214.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1550E3A67D9; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:37:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by nutshell.tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id n131aoVR020678; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:36:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nodnsquery(10.66.1.30) by nutshell.tislabs.com via csmap (V6.0) id srcAAA2baOyO; Mon, 2 Feb 09 20:36:50 -0500
Received: by pecan.tislabs.com (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 3D7E53F483; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:34:34 -0500 (EST)
To: clonvick@cisco.com, dbrungard@att.com, iesg@ietf.org, jpv@cisco.com, rbradfor@cisco.com, secdir@ietf.org, @tislabs.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, Bradford@tislabs.com, Brungard@tislabs.com, Chris@tislabs.com, Deborah@tislabs.com, Lonvick@tislabs.com, rcallon@juniper.net, Rich@tislabs.com, sandy@tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: <3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C05972908@emailwf1.jnpr.net>
Message-Id: <20090203013434.3D7E53F483@pecan.tislabs.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:34:34 -0500
From: sandy@tislabs.com
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-path-key-ero-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: secdir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: secdir-bounces@ietf.org

>Where you see "RFC5440", assume that this refers to
>"draft-ietf-pce-pcep-19.txt". The RFC editor will have no trouble making
>the connection, and RFC5440 is exceptionally likely to be published
>before this document gets to the RFC editor.=20

This is about what I expected (and why I went searching the rfc editor
queue).

But what I was curious about was what the reference said, not its
publication status.

Thanks for the pointer.

--Sandy
_______________________________________________
secdir mailing list
secdir@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir