IETF Logo Mail Archive

[secdir] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-04

Shawn M Emery <shawn.emery@oracle.com> Mon, 29 August 2016 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <shawn.emery@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9150112D889 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 13:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ur5V0Kf5LoDB for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 13:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03B8912D881 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 13:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u7TKOUNo003226 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:24:31 GMT
Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u7TKOUa8015879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:24:30 GMT
Received: from abhmp0019.oracle.com (abhmp0019.oracle.com [141.146.116.25]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u7TKOO4A022717; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:24:29 GMT
Received: from [10.159.78.71] (/10.159.78.71) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 13:24:23 -0700
References: <5770C231.9060301@oracle.com>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
From: Shawn M Emery <shawn.emery@oracle.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <5770C231.9060301@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <3413ce55-8a13-9698-5985-7fecc8c8f038@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:26:37 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5770C231.9060301@oracle.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------4B0D2A68AD9598BB987E2A73"
X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/JUvyylmYH7olcqYzyGimGzLfuds>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:24:37 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.

This draft specifies multipath support in environments where Entropy Labels
(ELs) are used so that Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and Traceroute
operations are possible.

The security considerations section does exist and refers to the security
considerations in base specifications for applicability.  The sections
continues that there are no new security considerations with
this specification.  I agree with this assertion.

General comments:

None.

Editorial comments:

s/initiator to not be able to/initiator that is unable to/

"LSPs stitched together": not for sure what "stitched" means and wasn't
defined in the Terminology section.

Shawn.
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email