IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] AD's acknowledging reviews

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Fri, 08 May 2020 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9003A0EE6 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 13:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mVCzIWri7hpE for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 13:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D47843A0EE8 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 13:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 048KuYeo006010 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 8 May 2020 16:56:36 -0400
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 13:56:33 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200508205633.GS27494@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <F9C3BBE9-D04A-482E-966F-050C2F0A6A97@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <F9C3BBE9-D04A-482E-966F-050C2F0A6A97@akamai.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/V6obyQBgyBWEOLIgcbQvgJCBQK8>
Subject: Re: [secdir] AD's acknowledging reviews
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 20:56:41 -0000

Hi Rich,

Sorry to have left you hanging -- I thought I had replied to one of the
previous incarnations of the question.

Yes, this is a good thing to do, and I do it sometimes.  Arguably not as
often as I should, but if I am crunched for time it does not always feel
like a strict necessity and can get overlooked.

Thanks for bringing it up,

Ben

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 08:38:21PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
> I have asked about this twice before, and have never received an AD response. Perhaps third time’s the charm.
> 
> After a secdir review is done, and after any comment threads have died down, it would be polite for the responsible AD to acknowledge the review and indicate what they are planning on doing. Alissa does this for gen-art directorate reviews, see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/AKp-b-S4B_ITv8EKg_UgD1wBh3k/ for an example.
> 

> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email