[secdir] Re: SECDIR telechat review of draft-ietf-raw-technologies-15

pascal.thubert@gmail.com Tue, 01 April 2025 12:15 UTC

Return-Path: <pascal.thubert@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3564915BED8D; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 05:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IhlkMkXEMnta; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 05:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A767F15BEA77; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 05:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4394a823036so51789355e9.0; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 05:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743509688; x=1744114488; darn=ietf.org; h=thread-index:content-language:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=DGqwUyjp9CUdRa8egZ8Q7lVEFPGJJ+g6TY/eMgMMDf8=; b=kag8AJOodROCN5jGeCzYx7T76MJuzKVKZalApO3+oQSvKEUi3IZq6GwMYISlQio6Pg X+RntHsw5qXbRKnxF/zWLp2vNde65MlN1Pn8C30BL4JQMTQfBQNfALJPly7FDWxLcvbR PZBpfck5Vc9hlzlC+WPU5b31o+mIBaMinh751O2tHjLQmqbVIrQ2UkfM0qd9bbKktXVU Cu4I/4ZMvflgu6uY6+HGTrCv1Ml03QXnNqdUyqNUkWdmqdjmQY2ZZTkO0PwNNAs1ar03 XZIMqgVaY8cjncCbAZPKLAZkEP+69vlJA9eFD/Yyakp9ld5BqfG9fuerkgPLoXq763Zg yUbg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743509688; x=1744114488; h=thread-index:content-language:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DGqwUyjp9CUdRa8egZ8Q7lVEFPGJJ+g6TY/eMgMMDf8=; b=pt/rrne39cjx74zwBede29MS/jP9KEHqOwS9ourwyTvD+ApUltTMM8DdBeuybua0q7 /YjjaOgBGewO8gzYOReynRJlu9ym9u3UTOY2yEy/23zeSMscIEDkZeeoGAm2uwEq6bFI AeZI7JUHVDK2MD9NAIG9Z0g+lvZVbJ+wnT3gxwIkKtJkS+pERUmPj7rwhtKijvOAQCXg BobbZV/rd36wycEILeYGpSKk19x9MzsPM53PVmvu16sCPE4GeqNhJpv+RwWaguPE1SQd +bz7zaxow2LDCkasl/hgHHfHD5bMqOYqbgbP/2zaAYXzZDdmWQdqaKJnJsbYkP+xT+JA gPmg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU5+o3ic+9mQvrWR0mm7ecEMsEY4eU+0bGlaVY4sOB30F/+JjMhEMhUoybprHn9oOob2ZCZ8pLy8Zs8@ietf.org, AJvYcCUHNwyXlJYcEspATL/4oi2nJ+4YWc70xAvVAgkTtT3t8l+iE2y9XcKqjHcJMZb5f8+hh3x/zA==@ietf.org, AJvYcCW1Ftk0rq+kJ4yoOdg734LOqYDl9Rr93GI1iOlB5cC9ljh7B9wD562JCLUfL/9/VyY/hNgdHSQnqwR5ooXTAcA5R8Qu1Zi+dAVobtln5Pm/@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YycLs/Glhp98weTZPIvRx178yb0TSSZkyb7qe/Xs9H3L9Heo+HP ruKJ2edjL7x5sr7oG/Z9hzcJYHo818WlwsANxJuXM6HcpQo0cSrgpV6zU75b
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvHSak0xrFwR4Va+7ncNZrOLqCS+SEkIyl5+7PNa12Wgn4q8Jb/En8dBPDm4jV apyeXPyDWmvryqm17sAckz1F3/8hCJioRKcYw81WJbwL9HxhZFsgoqEL6SYPRqg3gXMFtiYW+cn JpPbeIURvNQAiZhLKrwYlfxLLEJH/BjOdagJkGTZPyBTSRalX95UXD8OMaE0uXzMJUbSWEU++ER PJG+Q+iEl9mG1Lp9oTbZvc63Fw2xuM4v719U9t+h4NZHHTWDaacqdFh5vV7BdcgjoTz1HNLc+82 5X5EDrYotQvi31AfB824KWJ+clZjnuVoGzkkdwmp3ukuZKEh2fn3ypPx
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH6gdiBkv2LXmzrpCT53AKsKeX3Jw9XZ0sDVLJm6rHKDce0aDx1d574tAQ99QPFT3544T5u6A==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1da1:b0:43b:c284:5bc2 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43dabe23d8amr119104655e9.0.1743509687122; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 05:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PC2Pascal ([2a01:cb1d:b0e:fb00:980d:559e:3b82:1dd3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43d8fbbfebasm153812065e9.10.2025.04.01.05.14.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Apr 2025 05:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: pascal.thubert@gmail.com
To: 'Donald Eastlake' <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, iesg@ietf.org
References: <CAF4+nEEFsAz-q0uZSZxqt68W3XbmuZ1nCmKdr_kZnxPhztbSOw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEEFsAz-q0uZSZxqt68W3XbmuZ1nCmKdr_kZnxPhztbSOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 14:14:45 +0200
Message-ID: <073a01dba2ff$a88043a0$f980cae0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_073B_01DBA310.6C0A2510"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: fr
Thread-Index: AQIAvsB8SLkxsK/8usG/9v8OEehD7rNEgbJw
Message-ID-Hash: F7Q5KT3KB2FLXTALRNQK4TYU4OJA6SLM
X-Message-ID-Hash: F7Q5KT3KB2FLXTALRNQK4TYU4OJA6SLM
X-MailFrom: pascal.thubert@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-secdir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: 'secdir' <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-raw-technologies.all@ietf.org, 'Last Call' <last-call@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [secdir] Re: SECDIR telechat review of draft-ietf-raw-technologies-15
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/hqsayQoWnDHf_y5vSC0kXugWhrs>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:secdir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secdir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secdir-leave@ietf.org>

Hello Don, 

 

All done in  <https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-raw-technologies-15&url2=draft-ietf-raw-technologies-16&difftype=--html> Diff: draft-ietf-raw-technologies-15.txt - draft-ietf-raw-technologies-16.txt

 

Many thanks again !

 

Pascal

 

De : Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> 
Envoyé : lundi 31 mars 2025 18:05
À : iesg@ietf.org
Cc : secdir <secdir@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-raw-technologies.all@ietf.org; Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>
Objet : SECDIR telechat review of draft-ietf-raw-technologies-15

 

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready.

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready.

I previously reviewed this document here:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/UsGPRGLtTcy7Kh4YaT4lUbn5PUs
and consider my comments there to have been resolved.

Security
--------

Given that this is a survey document for which security is generally
out of scope, I consider the very brief Security Considerations
section to be satisfactory.

Two Minor Comments
------------------

The first paragraph of Section 4 seems to imply that 802.11 is no
longer trying for better speed. It is true that reliability is now
more of a focus. The current big effort is 802.11bn which does
emphasize reduced loss and reduced latency but still includes a goal
of 25% higher throughput. I suggest the following wording change:
OLD
   In the recent years, the evolution of the IEEE Std 802.11 standard is
   taking a new direction, looking not any more for more speed, but also
   for reliability, to enable new fields of application such as
   Industrial IoT and Virtual Reality.
NEW
   In the recent years, the evolution of the IEEE Std 802.11 standard
   has taken a new direction, emphasizing improved reliability and
   reduced latency as well as minor improvements in speed, to enable
   new fields of application such as Industrial IoT and Virtual
   Reality.

There is one occurrence of "(WFA)" in the document which I think should be changed to "[WFA]" since [WFA] has been added to the References.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com <mailto:d3e3e3@gmail.com> 

 

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com <mailto:d3e3e3@gmail.com>