Re: [secdir] [Isms] secdirreview ofdraft-ietf-isms-transport-security-model-12

"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Wed, 06 May 2009 06:34 UTC

Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26DD3A6D99; Tue, 5 May 2009 23:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.264
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.335, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id APd+vbDPfEl3; Tue, 5 May 2009 23:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26FA28C2A2; Tue, 5 May 2009 23:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=ZCfDUSPI4y2lymIkeFzD/aKt/DGZr6iF2Y71N5UHfaCCQ/DoJ5hjJdEfFnj7Hdo4; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [68.164.80.233] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>) id 1M1ai3-0007Hq-47; Wed, 06 May 2009 02:34:27 -0400
Message-ID: <005901c9ce15$1f2f5300$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
References: <6c9fcc2a0905021333j3dd58821v4726af092e30c1c1@mail.gmail.com><200905051750.n45HorPw023985@mx02.srv.cs.cmu.edu><0FBA56D16F71437450BC2779@minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu> <06a701c9cdb7$aed00f30$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 23:37:25 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d88884f945684cbf696816e54f1a9a3995a2d36e37862333af29350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 68.164.80.233
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 05 May 2009 23:35:39 -0700
Cc: draft-ietf-isms-transport-security-model@tools.ietf.org, isms@ietf.org, isms-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] [Isms] secdirreview ofdraft-ietf-isms-transport-security-model-12
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 06:34:08 -0000

Hi -

> From: "David B Harrington" <dbharrington@comcast.net>
> To: "'Jeffrey Hutzelman'" <jhutz@cmu.edu>; "'Barry Leiba'" <barryleiba@computer.org>; <secdir@ietf.org>; <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: <draft-ietf-isms-transport-security-model@tools.ietf.org>; <isms@ietf.org>; <isms-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 12:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [Isms] [secdir] secdirreview ofdraft-ietf-isms-transport-security-model-12
...
> What is the correct non-RFC2119 phrase in which to couch our
> deployment advice?
...

Sounds like what RFC 2026 calls an "Applicability Statement".

Randy