IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-impairments-07

Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Fri, 21 October 2011 04:33 UTC

Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC2C21F84E5; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.436
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.436 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.163, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Suts3j2oMoNr; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usaga02-in.huawei.com (usaga02-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2304B21F84DD; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LTE00LBFFCLTB@usaga02-in.huawei.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:33:58 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.18.4.104]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPS id <0LTE00DTMFCLYE@usaga02-in.huawei.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:33:57 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from DFWEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:33:59 -0700
Received: from DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.124.31.87]) by dfweml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.203]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:33:52 -0700
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:33:50 +0000
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <CAK3OfOg=P-g3RZoj8yznEvqU=J6HxOFQeEYS0uY07QBGZ1wDWQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.18.29.181]
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Message-id: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E17181821C9@DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Thread-topic: Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-impairments-07
Thread-index: AQHMiK1k/aUAVZm3CECvsX0ct9xRXZV4912AgAB+a4CACZDzwIABQM0AgAH7whA=
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
References: <CAK3OfOj5Y8waYhCpoiiYg0GrL3E5SvWAPkkxmhP+2RHhoDdzgw@mail.gmail.com> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E171817FEAA@DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAK3OfOhvV6HwH5i14LqmZX-o4aEzCe3Wk=8iZdg9AnVCXuJcsw@mail.gmail.com> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1718181C1B@DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAK3OfOg=P-g3RZoj8yznEvqU=J6HxOFQeEYS0uY07QBGZ1wDWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-impairments@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-impairments@tools.ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-impairments-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:33:59 -0000

Hi Nico,

Thanks for your thorough review and suggestions, and accepting the modified texts. 

Best Regards,
Young

-----Original Message-----
From: Nico Williams [mailto:nico@cryptonector.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 10:14 AM
To: Leeyoung
Cc: secdir@ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-impairments@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-impairments-07

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> wrote:
> As you indicated in the latest response, this document is first of all informational and does not define any new protocols beyond the family of OSPF-TE, RSVP-TE and PCEP. There are no new requirements caused by IA-RWA other than the need for processing additional routing/signaling related data beyond the regular TE networks.
> These additional data would not add any particular security requirements in my opinion.

The fact that this is an informational document doesn't mean there's
no need to be thorough.  On the contrary, since a beginner to the
subject might start by reading the informational documents, this one's
a good place to discuss security issues.

> Anyhow, please see the following changes if you would be satisfied with them.

I'm happy with the proposed text.  Thanks!

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email