IETF Logo Mail Archive

[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-02

Dacheng <zhang_dacheng@hotmail.com> Thu, 26 February 2015 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <zhang_dacheng@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7ED1A1BE3 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 01:30:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fRMzgDkrYGit for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 01:30:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU004-OMC2S4.hotmail.com (blu004-omc2s4.hotmail.com [65.55.111.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C44181A0367 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 01:30:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU436-SMTP137 ([65.55.111.73]) by BLU004-OMC2S4.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Thu, 26 Feb 2015 01:30:34 -0800
X-TMN: [smRw7VDuzUE7ngB+7PBG08jDBiDaiOzk]
X-Originating-Email: [zhang_dacheng@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP13787CC7E4947CEE57C9CE288140@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B6F8753C-E7D7-4463-BB1F-EEB22E6D8EDB"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Dacheng <zhang_dacheng@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54EAD095.2000200@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:30:22 +0800
References: <54AA17B0.40500@oracle.com> <54EAD095.2000200@oracle.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2015 09:30:32.0509 (UTC) FILETIME=[DE05D6D0:01D051A6]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/s0AWC8xeGj5O9EPGiwvmzDKWvOw>
Cc: draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:30:39 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the  security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document specifies a registry of label format specifications.

I didn’t see any security issues in this document and consider it Ready To Publish.

Cheers

Dacheng

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email