Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-09

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 14 July 2022 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC30C159484; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GHpNWiWkmfCH; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61FB6C159480; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id j22so657564ejs.2; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=97rTjs+lxoryRqZpAHdOlWh/k+8XBpH2sJYBkf76FOM=; b=BAT8VnGoUbksEYqAsB+iKU6YeJH3QY9opBczh0DRhlhZ2zxeWHef66K//MX8wEieDO cY28dN4tsCNMK+5GPHmjTkeRaFSc85/bfS4L5ed3UlD/QIJU/eF6t4ecXWTfoQ5RsiXw wSaKNDISdZ3sPGJP/KKO3PeyWWjmMruSubDXiE3Jr1ZDjidLWXFfAxbULpZkhkOny1lZ nd9BT9FjAAolnxCYhe+c6Y/PiDVu+xgYuEqxkJZaKd6gCreSbFg/GS3HV/N5IHWF97l+ VCuWrQDE8ojXioVNcCkcHh3VcSyxz70OqU7u1DH0ln4ePVvuP105Qfx1+VGBVZ7vVura L2IQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=97rTjs+lxoryRqZpAHdOlWh/k+8XBpH2sJYBkf76FOM=; b=ynr5GG5agcdEYt1Xs0jwddcG9rbZGzF4tT45zsb82pFNMHI4GJ5V6LRtqd/4pgfGa+ 35JFO1MfbG7EmzP4N/h1QAX8lHJJ9DxXnCwIDUKzbIPjqRJ4rT7J6iaCXSoTvvnFpMsl 5G/vo0R5wN44rF7wsBP1QX9LJRdNkD02pBgA91nnk4+UGWFaasqrkwt7BhElFjQgzsgP b1OEFjhyh/7dviU7GH5Z5wHrbLF+aHjzdsdoe7zk9OsIyJhBEKnRPTdl+Vl4cd8z3Bgz sddUkZqqL0lXNx4iaWWNFlTVtVVTAtGb7KYIUKkVEPtihqAxNWjerlm1hKpnDfi2O6W9 f59w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8Om0mCvC9Y6YB4NYwtPs4YDlkXJWvAh6MbbSjWOjIYhKg4SSst Zdpf7oQOZbc2lmUQUUe0EmGXDaNG5tE/cOOH+BJW3R1tTdI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1szU4o+pBuvLM5+oUWFnlhoJaEm2jeIbLztFrkq87jyfv1Eu2RppSXpIksxhIKnnSqWVz4G++u3Ce13oTi9TC8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:a429:b0:726:2d63:25f7 with SMTP id sg41-20020a170907a42900b007262d6325f7mr6315125ejc.112.1657759066670; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <165766858084.5251.12485129434316295805@ietfa.amsl.com> <b24e2934-200f-4f80-5261-aa2a977da39b@stpeter.im> <CAChr6Syq+uOTJsvqWuSustq_HdTaXCtDepyCuRWx+jGoEB06Fw@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SzkAmbjGK4XOwPkSwssLoG4NW1yG-6b2aFdFr43yF2zwQ@mail.gmail.com> <c516d0e4-f477-a4fb-2638-3615434f48f2@stpeter.im> <CAChr6SwgwknvgAycr6s=6tCRQZoZdiJxRXJpoTejEcW7g+bv=A@mail.gmail.com> <359BC9EA-FB6D-49E8-8CA6-AA395114838B@akamai.com> <cd793161-3535-41f8-a6f3-ed5b160048c6@stpeter.im> <CAChr6Sy=Jm-jTRxcyy8fTY_6qFxufFcmwK_3NoRai-1Qe=h_kw@mail.gmail.com> <795e1571-4862-831e-e77a-036bb562c6d9@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <795e1571-4862-831e-e77a-036bb562c6d9@stpeter.im>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:37:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SxGamGuxFReByCR0ScP=v9zycA+4b=tNVk2N9Wc6m1+ew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004ac87f05e3b91c61"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/vToCV3TKj4sqbV6opIoULqfnpEk>
Subject: Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:37:48 -0000

Just publish it. It’s fine.

thanks,
Rob

On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 17:31 Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:

> On 7/13/22 6:29 PM, Rob Sayre wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think the main problem would be that the handshake is vastly different.
> >
> > I don’t care which document the deprecation happens in, because I am
> right.
>
> Great. Perhaps you could start work on an Internet-Draft entitled
> "Deprecating TLS 1.2" along the lines of RFC 8996. Once it gains IETF
> consensus, it could update rfc7525bis.
>
> Peter
>