[sfc] Fwd: Please Respond on IPR in your Internet Draft Fwd: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt

[Donald Eastlake <[e-mail]>]

Hi, see below IPR declaration from Kent Leung.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   [phone] (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 [e-mail]


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Kent L <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: Please Respond on IPR in your Internet Draft Fwd: Fwd: [sfc]
I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt
To: Donald Eastlake <[e-mail]>
Cc: Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>


Hi. I'm not aware of any undeclared IPR in that draft

On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 1:08 PM Donald Eastlake <[e-mail]> wrote:

> ...
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Joel M. Halpern <[e-mail]>
> Date: Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:02 AM
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt
> To: Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>, Service Function Chaining IETF
> list <[e-mail]>
>
>
> While we are conducting the last call, and deciding who will shepherd
> this document...
> 1) If anyone would like to shepherd it, please let me or Jim know.
> 2) Would the authors and key contributors please confirm to the lsit
> that all known relevant IPR has been disclosed.
>
> Thank you,
> Joel
>
> On 10/19/2021 12:39 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> > Dear Jim and Joel,
> > we've completed merging the substantive parts of two SFC OAM drafts.
> > Many thanks to Med for his thorough reviews, thoughtful comments that
> > helped us improve the document. The authors believe that the draft is
> > stable and is ready for the WG LC. We greatly appreciate your
> > consideration of starting the WG LC and are committed to addressing
> > questions and comments.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Greg (on behalf off the authors)
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > From: <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> > Date: Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 9:33 AM
> > Subject: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt
> > To: <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> > Cc: <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> >
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> > directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Service Function Chaining WG of the
> IETF.
> >
> >          Title           : Active OAM for Service Function Chaining
> >          Authors         : Greg Mirsky
> >                            Wei Meng
> >                            Ting Ao
> >                            Kent Leung
> >                            Gyan Mishra
> >          Filename        : draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt
> >          Pages           : 37
> >          Date            : 2021-10-19
> >
> > Abstract:
> >     A set of requirements for active Operation, Administration, and
> >     Maintenance (OAM) of Service Function Chains (SFCs) in a network is
> >     presented in this document.  Based on these requirements, an
> >     encapsulation of active OAM messages in SFC and a mechanism to detect
> >     and localize defects are described.
> >
> >     This document updates RFC 8300.  Particularly, it updates the
> >     definition of O (OAM) bit in the Network Service Header (NSH) (RFC
> >     8300) and defines how an active OAM message is identified in the NSH.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/
> > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/>
> >
> > There is also an HTML version available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.html
> > <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.html>
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16
> > <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16>
> >
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
>